| Re: Name in order the inferiority of factory suspension components vs. Banski type parts |
Subject: Re: Name in order the inferiority of factory suspension components vs. Banski type parts by iCorvette on 2010/12/13 4:13:16 why just 84-87? was there an improvement after? I figure when the car was new the center of the bushings was actual, and over time the weight of the car would stretch the rubber, sagging the car, hence some of the stories about driver side sag, I don't know... so when my polys went in, the true center-line of arm was re-established throughout, subsequently returning the car to original static geometry. I don't believe/feel there is binding...if it were the suspension would not move and if it did it would stay at were it moved to. i am sure there is some of it going on, but with the weight of the car, it can over come it and center itself while going through it's paces on day in and day out driving. wrong? I install a vbp 32mm solid front bar and the drivers link dislodge from the bar, I have seen picks of another car doing the same thing, what is going on here?. remember when they were just a long stud with 4 bushings? no binding... what is a cheap fix, I don't notice any ill manners from my "broken link" been 2 years, tried puting it back twice, popped right back out.... |
