Become a Fan!
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember Me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Who's Online
245 user(s) are online (206 user(s) are browsing Forums)

more...
Guru Dictionary
Report message:*
 

Re: '84-86 RPO D98 Pin Stripes - Unicorn or Real

Subject: Re: '84-86 RPO D98 Pin Stripes - Unicorn or Real
by j3studio on 2012/5/13 17:45:55

Quote:

CorvetteArchives wrote:
The NCRS is assuredly well intentioned but nonetheless amateur in its approach. As a professional museum curator their work is SLOPPY and very unscientific and an insult to my profession. The 84 judging guide is ripe with errors (as any original 84 owner can tell you). The original owner survey was initially done by an 86 owner from NJ with zero attention to detail and corrections are a long time coming.

Perhaps they have since corrected their errors as its been a few years since I purchased their guide and tossed in in a drawer in disgust. I do not intend to waste any more $ on them :-P

It's truly a a wonder to me that anyone gives them any credibility at all...I can only IMAGINE the errors people believe as fact for previous years!


I was a member of the NCRS, but am no longer one.

The first edition of the 1984-1986 judging guide did have a bunch of errors, but any conscientious C4 judge (and that describes almost all that I met) has a many annotations and updates in their copy. The C4 team leaders have also been able to photograph many of the strange early C4 exceptions (my early 1985's emissions label placement, for example). I am confident that the second edition will be far superior and I will purchase it, even though I'm no longer playing that game.

Any NCRS judging guide is intended as a starting point - no more. When judging, I would routinely tell owners not to change anything unless they were sure it was wrong. Despite the intentions of McLellan to get the C4 right the first time, there were hundreds of changes just in the first three years. Only starting to judge a lot of cars in a somewhat rigorous fashion would bring these differences to the fore. So, kind of a chicken and egg thing.

In hindsight, it might have been better to write the C4 guides from the ground up instead of basing the format on the late C3 guides. However, this wasn't easily knowable: adding mid-years and sharks had been done that way and it had worked out.

The later C4 judging guides are far superior - in particular, the 1990-1996 guides are excellent.
CorvetteForum.guru is independently owned and operated. This site is not associated with or financially supported by General Motors.

Copyright 2008-2015 CorvetteForum.guru

CorvetteForum.guru is a Guru Garage Site (Coming Soon!)

If you have any questions about our site, please contact us at Andy@corvetteforum.guru.

Powered by XOOPS 2.56 Copyright 2001-2014 www.xoops.org

Hosted by GoDaddy.com.