| Re: Interesring article on fluid dynamics and airflow |
Subject: Re: Interesring article on fluid dynamics and airflow by jsup on 2008/11/23 0:29:35 I have to ask you this question Dan.... If small ports, big flow are the ticket, why is it that areas where R&D money is spent in trems of BILLIONS of dollars aren't all these companies, race teams, etc....going in that direction? There is only one company on earth pushing this concept, and you've sucked it down hook line and sinker. It is NOT industry accepted dogma. Is it that big a secret? Are their engineers Brodix, Dart, TFS, Edlebrock, and the rest that incompetent? Big companies such as Brodix clearly have the expertise and budget to do it, right? Why wouldn't they want to do it. Billions spent in race motors where you have to build to a specific spec yet it's not happening there, and don't say that is racing, please. If small ports and big flow were the ticket, none of these people would be ignoring it. Don'tcha think? Track cars, race boats, millions and millions spent, yet small port big flow heads are never found in places where $$$ is the goal and winning is the issue. I'm talking about environments where rods are cut to be egg shaped by 1000ths of an inch so when they spin they turn round. You think they'd figure out this head port thing? Just sayin'....it's bigger than that, don't buy the hype. It has never been proven. Ever. |
