| Re: Engine Dyno Predictions: |
Subject: Re: Engine Dyno Predictions: by 88BlackZ51 on 2008/12/27 1:57:56 First off. Let's be civil. I am trying my best. John. We all know you have spent hundreds of hours in regards to posting about cylinder heads, talking to people about cylinder heads, researhing cylinder heads and probably if your "wife" was asked, talking about cylinder heads in your sleep. You were told by Tony that you would make "30-40" more HP with the AFR's, and I mentioned you are leaving power on the table with those 210 Dart's. You did not like those comments, and therefore this was the big reason why you went on this AFR rant! Am I right or totally wrong? Now this brings me to this. You have been talking for months, and months about AFR marketing and "leghumpers", and that "wetflow" technology was the best way to measure cfm? Am I correct in saying this John? Also would you agree that the Dart's were outperformed by the AFR's in this test we are talking about One more thing, would you also agree that this was a fair test especially since they both cost around the $1400 mark? And if you didn't think this was a fair comparison, then what AFR head would be a fair comparison in your eyes? I would like to hear your answers before I continue. |
