Become a Fan!
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember Me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Who's Online
295 user(s) are online (262 user(s) are browsing Forums)

more...
Guru Dictionary
Report message:*
 

Re: Leafs vs Coils: How to relate spring rate?

Subject: Re: Leafs vs Coils: How to relate spring rate?
by ghoffman on 2008/11/9 22:58:40

Tom is correct, the motion ratios (shock travel/wheel travel) need to be equated. The leaf spring forces are reacted on the lower a-arm in the middle of the web(s) and the coil overs have both the ratio of lever ration and the angle of the coil-overs as well. This is not necessarily linear, and in the case of the C5 and C6 the rear motion ratios for a coil overs are not only not linear/constant but have a falling rate that makes a linear spring a bad idea. The rear shock is at a severe angle and that angle gets less with bump travel. This means that a linear spring that is appropriate at ride height is too soft at full bump and vice-versa. That is why we use a dual rate setup on our Hardbar/Penske coil over package and also use a very significant bump "rubber" (really a polyurethane foam) that makes it a triple rate to compensate for this non-linear motion ratio.
CorvetteForum.guru is independently owned and operated. This site is not associated with or financially supported by General Motors.

Copyright 2008-2015 CorvetteForum.guru

CorvetteForum.guru is a Guru Garage Site (Coming Soon!)

If you have any questions about our site, please contact us at Andy@corvetteforum.guru.

Powered by XOOPS 2.56 Copyright 2001-2014 www.xoops.org

Hosted by GoDaddy.com.