Become a Fan!
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember Me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Who's Online
297 user(s) are online (248 user(s) are browsing Forums)

more...
Guru Dictionary
Print in friendly format Send this term to a friend  St Louis
St Louis, MO, is the location of the Corvette assembly plant from 1954-1981.

Since 1981, Corvettes have been assembled in Bowling Green, KY.
...
Supporting Vendors
Platinum
Mid America Motorworks
Mid America Motorworks FREE CATALOG


Gold
FIC 770-888-1662


Registered Vendors
Guru Friends
Supporting Banners

TIRERACK.com - Revolutionizing Tire Buying


Shop for Winter Tires Now!




Support This Site
   All Posts (BeachBum)


« 1 ... 12 13 14 (15)


Re: [article] T.P.I.S. builds a 396 LT1
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Quote:

BrianCunningham wrote:
PEAK HORSEPOWER: 552@6,200
PEAK TORQUE: 484 FT.-LBS.@5,500

http://www.tpis.com/LT1-lowres.pdf


Thanks for sharing Brian !

Torque is good too, I know some will look at it as a low number, but when you consider this is a motor based upon a 4" bore that is cammed to make its HP peak above 6k, 480 ftlbs is pretty solid. Easy low 11's in a C4 with that motor, and even into the 10's.

It is an interesting combination.... I've seen the ZZX cam on several different builds and was seriously considering early in my build, but passed on it.

Posted on: 2008/11/21 22:55
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Good to see old CF forum names again
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Quote:

jsup wrote:
Quote:

BeachBum wrote:

How about you ! Looks like a new 450 !! damn sbc are getting bigger all the time.... before long, my 436 will be considered dinky with builders like you around I know you're building 88black's motor.... I think he did well in choosing you ! Nothing better than choosing a builder that builds and races what you're building !


I forget where I read it, however, recently I read that most new hot rods are going 500+ cubic inches, many over 600 and some 700+. Most small blocks are going 400 CI and better. As big as 454 small blocks.

Motors are getting bigger and bigger.

350s/383s will be considered puny soon.

There was charts and graphs as to the breakdown of motor sizes over years, and they are going up.


Yeap, when I made the decision to build my motor, it was one of the bigger configurations that you could get..... fast forward 6 months and the 427-434's are basically becoming the 383 of past years.....

I think my next move after I tear up this motor for a while will be an upgrade to new technology.....LSx something or another. Stuff should be a lot cheaper by then too.... I hope.

Posted on: 2008/11/21 22:36
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Good to see old CF forum names again
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Quote:

cuisinartvette wrote:
Quote:

BeachBum wrote:
Whats your set-up Cuisinartvette ?

-358 ci pump gas
-Scat 4340 crank
-Manley Sportmaster 6" rods,floating pins/Sportmaster flat tops
-Studded 4 bolt block. 0 deck
-Cusotm solid roler 250/254@ 050, .670/.660 lift 110 lobe sep.
-1.6 Jesel shaft rockers Crower sever duty lifters
-Dart Conquest heads ,heavily ported by Tony Mamo (302/232 cfm), angle milled along with angle milled & ported Team G
-Dougs headers
-T56 6 spd
-4.11 rear, lots of rear suspension work.
-Reduced weight wherever I could while keeping it all steel
67 Camino



Thats gotta be a fun ride.... rev happy motor with a 6 speed..... its hard to find something more fun than that.

I love the El Camino's too.... when I was around 19-20 years old, I bought a El Camino SS 396, but when I bought it, the 396 was gone, just had a boiler plate 350 with a 4 speed. Was a real SS, with steering wheel and cowl hood.... problem was, at that age, I had no idea what I had, I tore the piss out of it for a year or two and then sold it for drinking money..... wish I could go back in time on that one.... oh well.

Posted on: 2008/11/21 22:32
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Good to see old CF forum names again
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Quote:

dan0617 wrote:
Quote:

Dan,

I think if you're running right, high 11's will be no problem.....loosen up that converter another 500-1000 rpm and mid to low 11's could be realized.

As a note, I ran the next size smaller flat tappet cam on a 350 over a decade ago, I will say, I never really got that motor going strong, I'm not necessarily blaming the cam, but I would consider upgrading to a hyd roller cam, especially considering you already have the new stroker motor out.... would be easy. But regardless, I think easy 11's are in your future.

good luck !


Thanks! I had been thinking of going up a little on the converter but I am afraid a higher stall will tear my D36 to hell. I'm getting a 1.7 60ft time with my current setup, power limited as it dead hooks on Nitto drag radials. I'm thinking I'll get a 1.6 or possibly a 1.55 with the new setup and the 2800 stall and that is max for a D36. Running the 3.07 gear so that helps a little for survival. I am afraid a higher stall will yield me 1.5 or 1.4 60ft times if the tires stick and that will likely split my centersection. I'm thinking I better wait till I can afford to upgrade to a D44 or a solid rear before I up the stall any more. What do you think?


Yeah, the Dana 36 is marginal. I raced one for a long time many years ago, I actually did pretty good with it, and I think they'll generally do better than most people know. Albeit, I didn't have a lot of power then either. The half shaft bearings will go first, and even the halfshaft itself will sometimes literally twist itself into a pretzel. But, in general, the dana 36 itself does pretty good if you keep it straight.

I had easily over 500 1/4 mile passes with it with the vast majority of the 60's in the mid 1.6's to low 1.7's.... no problem, that was until one fine saturday afternoon at Carlsbad raceway, I got a little squirrely on the launch with a spin, I feathered the throttle to get it hooked up, which it did, but I was at an angle (slight fishtail), and this put a lot of load on the spider gears..... they exploded... literally. Thus, then upgraded to a Dana 44, besides an occasional halfshaft bearing, the D44 has survived at least 500 1.5x 60 fts.... and even a couple of high 1.4's......

But, that all aside, I actually think you'll be fine even running 1.5's with your d36.... just keep it straight. But, who knows with these types of things, you might blow-up your first time out, or it might last for a decade of racing.... you never know.

good luck and keep us updated !

Posted on: 2008/11/21 22:28
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Good to see old CF forum names again
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Quote:

dan0617 wrote:
Good to see some more familiar names joining up. My winter project is installing 383 shortblock I bought already assembled, slightly used. 230/236 flat tappet hydraulic cam. Going to put the AFR 195 street eliminators on top. Going with Rhodes vari-duration lifters to keep the street manners nice and tame. Re-installing the HSR intake, 2800 converter and such that I already have. I'm hoping to run high 11's on motor and high 10's on a 175 shot. Is that do-able?

Currently run high 12's on motor and ran an 11.43 on a 175 shot with a 224/230 cam on stock bottom end. That is with tons of blowby, which is what prompted my winter project!


Dan,

I think if you're running right, high 11's will be no problem.....loosen up that converter another 500-1000 rpm and mid to low 11's could be realized.

As a note, I ran the next size smaller flat tappet cam on a 350 over a decade ago, I will say, I never really got that motor going strong, I'm not necessarily blaming the cam, but I would consider upgrading to a hyd roller cam, especially considering you already have the new stroker motor out.... would be easy. But regardless, I think easy 11's are in your future.

good luck !

Posted on: 2008/11/21 2:40
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: How much HP will I get by porting intake?
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Quote:

dan0617 wrote:
Quote:

BeachBum wrote:
In my opinion, the best modification for a C4 if your just looking to spend a little, but see a real performance gain is a torque converter. With your stock C4 TPI set-up, a little 12" 2500 rpm converter would work great.... they can be had for $ 300 or less depending on where you get it.

If you're content on doing an engine modifications one at a time, I always advise to start from the middle and work your way out. Thus, if you're staying with your original shortblock, then slap in an aftermarket hyd roller cam..... I recommend the LPE 211 for your application..... its designed to compliment your long tube runner tpi set-up. You'll need new springs too. In the future, as you can afford it, you can upgrade the cylinder heads, intake, exhaust etc.... and not have to take them off again. It would be ideal if while you have your aluminum cylinder heads off the car you could have a some light port work with a valve job..... (perhaps around $ 700-800).... with the cam and light port work, you could see a real 50+ HP gain even with the stock exhaust.

good luck !


I couldn't agree more that a higher stall converter would benefit you alot. Just be careful in choosing the stall speed with a TPI setup. 2500 the absolute max I'd go. I installed a 2800 stall last fall, knowing I was going to a HSR intake over the winter. For the fall months the car wasn't good. It would launch like a beast but for the rest of the run the rpms stayed higher than the TPI's peak. I slowed down alot because of running higher than the powerband. I'd go with about a 2200 stall if I were you. A properly chosen stall converter helps with a less than optimal gear ratio as well. I'm a big advocate of used parts, and you can pick up a good higher than stall converter used for pretty cheap. Check with jsup if you are interested, he had one for sale a week or 2 ago.

As far as heads, there is power to be had in reworking the 113's if staying with a TPI intake. If scrapping the TPI setup then go with good aftermarket heads. I'll be selling a set of totally reworked 113's with 2.02/1.60 valves right after Christmas because they just arent enough for me.


I actually had a different experience..... albeit, mine was with a 383/219/AFR 190 set-up utilizing a PI Vig 3000 rpm converter, I put on the stock TPI, and was extremely impressed with everything..... car was docile, no slippage whatsoever and when you gave it gas, as expected it shot hard. Ran 12.0 with a 1.52 60ft..... would have easily been an 11 second et, but the transmission was set-up for shifting at 6000 rpm that day, which was wayyyy to high.

Conventional thought by most is to run a 2200-2600 rpm converter for a long tube runnered TPI..... and its not bad advise, but, I also do not think as much as 3200 is too high..... lands you right in front of tha torque peak and you go.... or at least you go until 4500 rpm or so

But, not sure what converter you were running, but maybe it was our difference in converters ? Don't know.

Posted on: 2008/11/20 21:38
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Good to see old CF forum names again
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Whats your set-up Cuisinartvette ?

Posted on: 2008/11/20 20:29
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Good to see old CF forum names again
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Hi Cuisinartvette,

I think others know I have built the motor on cf, or at least I think I talked about it before, but do not remember for sure.

Its a 4.165" bore x 4.00" stroke motor, Dart little M, forged bottom end built specifically for now and the future with Mahle pistons that allow me to drop compression down to about 11-1 with a 76 cc cylinder head and in the future when I roughen it up, with a decked 64 cc head down to around 60 cc I can run over 13-1 cr with the proper head gasket. Typical Miniram with hyd roller set-up.... for now anyway, might change that intake, but will give it a fair shake first. I'd prefer a converted SP on a big cube motor, but we'll see, maybe the Miniram will give me the performance I am shooting for out of this motor in street mode..... we'll see.

Posted on: 2008/11/20 19:39
_________________
863 cubic inches of C4 & C6 muscle
C6 Corvette Z06 - Lemans Metallic Blue
C4 Corvette 436 - Pure Black

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3933547 ... chevrolet-corvette/page-1
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Good to see old CF forum names again
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Quote:

tpi421vett wrote:
Sounds like your project is getting close. You'll love the big cubes and torque that 436 will make. Getting everything behind it to survive could be a different story! Was a 383 the last engine you had in your car, or was there something else after the 383? Going from a 383 to a 436 is day/night difference.


Yeah, I'm getting real close to putting the motor in, but I am not just doing a motor drop, also doing transmission, interior, paint, etc..... if you're doing it all yourself as I am, its actually a pretty big project.... would have had it done by now, but work travel, a back injury, a recent move and my wife dictating what little free time I have has put me behind schedule.... my life consists of working and then going where my wife tells me I am supposed to be....

Yeah, I used to race a 383.... in many different configurations over the years though. Was a good street friendly torque motor.... I'll miss it.

Yeah, the 436 is going to be a different animal, but it too is built fairly docile.... staying with a hyd roller cam, fairly tight converter. Not sure how it will do on the track yet, but you can be sure I'm going to run it hard. Will compete with it in the NHRA Summit ET bracket series Pro-class this coming spring..... hope the rear holds together for a season !

How about you ! Looks like a new 450 !! damn sbc are getting bigger all the time.... before long, my 436 will be considered dinky with builders like you around I know you're building 88black's motor.... I think he did well in choosing you ! Nothing better than choosing a builder that builds and races what you're building !

Posted on: 2008/11/20 18:49
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Good to see old CF forum names again
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Thanks guys..... but I've been here before, just never posted.... I'm lazy like that.

So, what is everybodys winter corvette project ? Mine is coming together nicely..... have a new completed 436 in the garage, gathering some odds and ends to complete. Just won a new dampner and brand new Meziere on ebay.... I always lose those auctions, but somehow won a few lately.... made my day. You know you're getting old when you celebrate winning an ebay auction.....

Posted on: 2008/11/20 18:17
_________________
863 cubic inches of C4 & C6 muscle
C6 Corvette Z06 - Lemans Metallic Blue
C4 Corvette 436 - Pure Black

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3933547 ... chevrolet-corvette/page-1
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Engine swap on the C1
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Quote:

lltrevino wrote:
You know a cnc is going to the exact same spot, every time.



The only thing I will add to this dilema is that the above statement is very far from the truth.... there are so many variables with a CNC machine that its incredible..... Operator error is by far and away the most common mistake made on a CNC machine. In addition, most CNC machines have a considerably amount of positioning error in them as they sit.

In the metalworking industry, there is a certain amount of scrap that is tolerated and actually built into the quoting they do. The scrap is generated by a wide variety of means, but all have to do with the CNC machine not doing what they were hoping it was going to do. In your situation, its sounds like the program itself is okay considering it has run other same brand cylinder heads successful, but keep in the G-code program they utilize for the path is simply just that, a programmed tool path. But, then a lot of good things have to happen for the CNC machine to actually follow that path.

The most common operator error is the loading of the offsets, you have multiple offsets for most CNC programs, in the case of a cylinder head, it can literally be a dozen or more. Starting with the correct tool offset, the operator has to touch the tool off and then load that length offset into the tool table either manually or automatically. Then they have to remember to enter in the tool radius. If the tool was previously set-up, has anybody changed that tool in the tool changer? and if yes, did they accidently put in the wrong tool in either length or diameter.... for example, a very, very common mistake is for the operator to change a worn out tool in the ATC, and puts in the correct type of mill such as an end-mill, but doesn't notice that he put in a 3/8" diameter tool rather than a 1/4"..... which means he has to manually change that diameter in the tool table after he touches off for the tool length, if he forgets, then the entire cnc program will be off by that amount, Ie meaning, the cut is too deep or too shallow.

Same goes with the work offsets, the corner of that cylinder head may be one offset, then the actually corner entry into the port may be another... they have to call the correct work zero offsets and hope they were correctly entered in the first time. Unless they have the perfect part fixtures, these will change from cylinder head to cylinder head..... and regardless, they should be reset for each cylinder head anyway, which requires the operator to re-touch off or probe the corners. To give you an example of what happens when a work offset is off, the path will be shifted over the value of the offset error, meaning, typically you will cut too deep on one side of the port, and you'll cut air on the other side.

What makes this that much more difficult, on a cylinder head, the cnc program is typically not one long part program based upon one offset, but instead, they'll do a port, step over, call the new offset, and then repeat the program, which is typically a subroutine they are calling. When using this method, an indication that an individual offset for a port was off is that one port is clearly damaged, but the others appear to be generally okay. (The good news about a work offset, is that if the machine has a good home reference, each offset is un-related to the other, thus you do not have a domino effect.)

There are many, many other operator errors that can and do damage parts everyday, plus there are many CNC machine set-up parameters & compensation that must be set-up correctly or the machine will not be acurate. In fact, most CNC machines utilize a rotary encoder for positional feedback, this alone is a big problem considering 90%+ of these are directly mounted on the Servo Motor..... thus, it does not take backlash, screw error or cross compensation into effect.... it instead reports the position of the axes as per the motor vs the actual table position. The more expensive option of Linear Encoders will vastly improve this situation, but due to the added expense, most CNC machining centers do not have them.

The above errors account for literally Billions of dollars in losses that are pretty much deemed acceptable every year to Manufacturers of all types of widgets..... just the nature of the game in the machining business. CNC manufacturers are constantly in competition with each other on how to make a CNC easier and more fool proof.... but alas, its always an uphill battle.

Having said that, with your particular situation, I have no idea what happened.... I'm just saying, keep an open mind and also do not for a second put your total faith in a CNC machine..... I think without a doubt the most common technical phone call that a CNC machine manufacturer receives from their customers is " Help !... my CNC machine will not repeat !"

Good luck with a decent resolution.

Posted on: 2008/11/20 18:06
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: How much HP will I get by porting intake?
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
In my opinion, the best modification for a C4 if your just looking to spend a little, but see a real performance gain is a torque converter. With your stock C4 TPI set-up, a little 12" 2500 rpm converter would work great.... they can be had for $ 300 or less depending on where you get it.

If you're content on doing an engine modifications one at a time, I always advise to start from the middle and work your way out. Thus, if you're staying with your original shortblock, then slap in an aftermarket hyd roller cam..... I recommend the LPE 211 for your application..... its designed to compliment your long tube runner tpi set-up. You'll need new springs too. In the future, as you can afford it, you can upgrade the cylinder heads, intake, exhaust etc.... and not have to take them off again. It would be ideal if while you have your aluminum cylinder heads off the car you could have a some light port work with a valve job..... (perhaps around $ 700-800).... with the cam and light port work, you could see a real 50+ HP gain even with the stock exhaust.

good luck !

Posted on: 2008/11/20 17:29
_________________
863 cubic inches of C4 & C6 muscle
C6 Corvette Z06 - Lemans Metallic Blue
C4 Corvette 436 - Pure Black

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3933547 ... chevrolet-corvette/page-1
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: How many corvette forums are you a member of?
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Corvetteforum
Digital Corvettes
corvette-guru now
Been a lurker at vettemod for a while, they have some good posts to read sometimes

Posted on: 2008/11/20 17:20
_________________
863 cubic inches of C4 & C6 muscle
C6 Corvette Z06 - Lemans Metallic Blue
C4 Corvette 436 - Pure Black

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3933547 ... chevrolet-corvette/page-1
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Good to see old CF forum names again
Master Guru
Joined:
2008/11/20 17:01
Posts: 751
Offline
Hi Jim,

I've lurked here for a long time, never did join, but if you're joining.... so am I

Welcome !

Posted on: 2008/11/20 17:19
_________________
863 cubic inches of C4 & C6 muscle
C6 Corvette Z06 - Lemans Metallic Blue
C4 Corvette 436 - Pure Black

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3933547 ... chevrolet-corvette/page-1
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer



 Top
« 1 ... 12 13 14 (15)




CorvetteForum.guru is independently owned and operated. This site is not associated with or financially supported by General Motors.

Copyright 2008-2015 CorvetteForum.guru

CorvetteForum.guru is a Guru Garage Site (Coming Soon!)

If you have any questions about our site, please contact us at Andy@corvetteforum.guru.

Powered by XOOPS 2.56 Copyright 2001-2014 www.xoops.org

Hosted by GoDaddy.com.