All Posts (mseven)
Re: My opinion on AFR |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
 
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
 |
I like the afr product.......but if I were building the ultimate big inch mo fo, here is what I would be looking at doing;
http://www.allproheads.com/images%2008/Web%202008%20Cat2-08.pdf
Posted on: 2008/11/29 6:56
|
|
 Transfer
|
 
|
|
Re: What do you guys think of this motor ? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
starting w/that set-up if they were willing to go up to 11:1 I figure about 30hp. gain. 20 min. if just going to 10.5:1. I think the 215 pro 1 is a bit small for that combo and it could have also used more cylinder head.
The overall number does seem low, I would have expected at least 560-575. Scott S.and schmidt's crate 434's w/about same cam, 220 head is near 595.
Posted on: 2008/11/28 3:48
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: Track day sometime in 2009? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
josh, I'll meet you in ohio....I don't know if I can miss the big guru match race
Posted on: 2008/11/27 0:08
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: Powder Coating....new rear end |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
no not stupid, the coat was first on the shaft only and I masked off the yolks. Then I brought them over to dyno tech for balancing. All shafts were high speed balanced (spun to 7k).
Posted on: 2008/11/27 0:05
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: Powder Coating....new rear end |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
thanks, no, wish I did but at the time it was completed and shipped to me I didn't want to tear it down just to coat it. However I did everything else, c, beam, d. shaft t.pan oil pan etc. all were coated
[IMG]http://i33.tinypic.com/rj2o0x.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i35.tinypic.com/14abju9.jpg[/IMG] for some reason it is cutting the pic off when you click on it..........
Posted on: 2008/11/26 23:55
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: Powder Coating....new rear end |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
if you're not doing everyhting I'd stick w/silver, this is powder coated....and no, it will not hurt anything.
[IMG]http://i37.tinypic.com/ets6dc.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i36.tinypic.com/r2meet.jpg[/IMG]
Posted on: 2008/11/26 23:27
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: [article] T.P.I.S. builds a 396 LT1 |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
you're welcome, and no prob. Quote:
Quote:
I guess I took it wrong and thought that was aimed towards me, in that case my appologies.
Posted on: 2008/11/26 3:50
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: Gents - Please Read This Message! Important! |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
me three
Posted on: 2008/11/23 2:36
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: [article] T.P.I.S. builds a 396 LT1 |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
jsup wrote:Quote:
when comp first released that rocker it there statement regarding less recipricating weight and strength, however, as I said, IMO, it would not be weight that would effect/increase your perfromance but the change in ratio (you stated "how much is this going to cost me"). http://www.compcams.com/information/P ... rArms/HiTechStainless.asp The zzx is .558 gross lift w/a 1.5:1, using the 1.7:1 raises the lift to .632. On your motor if the cam you have was rated at .602 w/a 1.5, changing to the 1.6:1 puts it at .642.lift., using a 1.7 would put it at .682 lift. Again if yours started at .602 lift rated w/a 1.6 the change to a 1.7:1 would bring it to .640....altering ratio, not weight would be the gain. Quote:
first off, let me be clear, I am talking about ratio changes on any motor. I am not coming to any conclusions, comparisons or the like....on their motor, mine or yours....don't even try it. I don't make any assumptions on paper or otherwise without all the facts. Have I said anything to give you the idea that it needed to be any certain way to make good power?
Posted on: 2008/11/22 4:43
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: [article] T.P.I.S. builds a 396 LT1 |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
BeachBum wrote: Torque is good too, I know some will look at it as a low number, but when you consider this is a motor based upon a 4" bore that is cammed to make its HP peak above 6k, 480 ftlbs is pretty solid. Easy low 11's in a C4 with that motor, and even into the 10's. It is an interesting combination.... I've seen the ZZX cam on several different builds and was seriously considering early in my build, but passed on it. No there's nothing wrong with the tq. I look at various feature builds and feel most like seeing hp. They also stated they did 3 pulls, so it appears they didn't go too hog nuts tuning. What software are you using to do et.calculations ? The zzx seems to produce good results, but after valve lash it's probably down to 235ish. I'm becoming more of a believer that at that point in hr.'s, the 242/242 solid becomes a good choice.
Posted on: 2008/11/21 23:29
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: [article] T.P.I.S. builds a 396 LT1 |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
It was from the magazine (editors?), of Street Thunder:
"After choosing the necessary components for our project 396 LT1, we worked with TPIS/Cottrell Racing Engines to assemble, dyno, and tune the engine. Combining our research and TPIS LT1 experience was sure to produce exceptional results" "We didnt use the most expensive parts to achieve the highest power figures; instead, we built a high performance engine that walks the line between street and race, but thatwould be at home under the hood of most any street machine, whether an early street rod or a latemodel sports car. Not only that, but our LT1 creation should easily achieve over 20 mpg on the highway in our six-speed equipped 85Camaro!Thats hard to beat."
Posted on: 2008/11/21 22:44
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: [article] T.P.I.S. builds a 396 LT1 |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
ok I'll bite why ? the reality is because TPIS didn't pick the parts.
Posted on: 2008/11/21 22:10
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: [article] T.P.I.S. builds a 396 LT1 |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
understandable............in the day when I was at the track everyweek and was serious about this stuff, no-one (aside from chrysler R&D)had a dyno...so it didn't matter. This time around the dyno pulls were part of a total deal that I struck....it was nice, but for me it's a source of reference for the rest of car. Never-the-less, I would rather use a chasis dyno for c.loop tuning (if I had the chance as opposed to my drive pull over and tweak method). I'll bet I could get a tune done way faster being able to hold it any rpm/load and tweak than my current method. Likewise, so.....what have I missed, where are you w/yours ? tune going well w/greg ? etc....guessin' the weather there has got you parked as well
Posted on: 2008/11/21 22:03
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: [article] T.P.I.S. builds a 396 LT1 |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
jsup wrote: the ss rockers are around 400.-500. now, they were more when they first came out. Difference in comparison to yours is not only weight but the increase to a 1.7 ratio. As to your "about 600 club" I have no idea what that's all about. But, your motor should have more 550chp (I have reservations being over 600 though), but since you aren't a fan of dyno's, I guess you/we will never know.
Posted on: 2008/11/21 21:42
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: [article] T.P.I.S. builds a 396 LT1 |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
my money is on them using the comps....trying to get an HP number, and no mention of the afr, which makes me think leaned (13.50:1+)and then yeiding a slightly lowered tq. TPIS didn't pick the parts, Jim told me his choices would have probably started w/the 210 head and the rest being somewhat different. Still, a very good motor though
Posted on: 2008/11/21 21:30
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: [article] T.P.I.S. builds a 396 LT1 |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Spalyed block w/oliver billet caps, lunati pro mod rods/crank, Diamond inverted dome slugs, 11.1:1 cr., zzx 239/239@50, approx .558 lift, 112 lsa, afr 195 eliminater 58cc., 1.7 comp cams "hi-tech" stainless, 58 tb., 36lb bosch III(white)..........it would have been nice to see the tq. number up a bit though.
Posted on: 2008/11/21 17:45
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: Carbon Fiber Rocker Cover review |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
Aaron I remember whom you speak of, and the stand off between him and JB......as well as his claim to be the first and doing them for a number of years. Glad you posted, what it was upon purchase. that sux on the c.fiber v.covers. Sheet metal v,covers are inexpensive nowadays. Places like speedway sell imported ones that are machine welded, 1/4" billet plate, polished out, and in various styles (including the moroso, or canton style) for 100. or less. They are straight, sit flat, look great and are actually an excellant product.
Posted on: 2008/10/24 13:53
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: Missing in Action |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
maybe he got his parole/work release ?? lol
Posted on: 2008/9/12 17:03
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: Trade? Something fishy? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
depending on where in detroit, I can take a look and snap a few pics for you.
Posted on: 2008/8/24 12:20
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
Re: Missing in Action |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
she carries them in her purse
[IMG]http://i33.tinypic.com/11h7a5j.jpg[/IMG]
Posted on: 2008/8/24 6:09
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:The Giants did it!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
[quote="bogus]
I guess his 3 past Super Bowl titles don't count? Dissing Brady because of one less than stellar game is a bit harsh, don't you think?[/quote] It has nothing to do with his ability, it is his unability to give credit where credit is due (poor sportsmanship). He should have recognized the ability that the Giants defense delivered in that game, and that the pats as a team did not or could not rise to the challange (he came off like sour grapes). I think any true professional in competitive events should possess an amount of humility and recognize that anything can happen and that anything is possible, regardless if it is due to injury or just lack of stellar performance. The medias aggressiveness trying to make him the next QB w/4 bowls and his response in interviews prior to the game, he 'seemingly' acted as if it was a a given, this lack of humbleness to the unknown, the lack of hunger, and combine this with all the media regarding him as "the perfect this and perfect that" came back to haunt him......who knows maybe gesele was on his mind
Posted on: 2008/2/6 0:08
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:The Giants did it!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
Belichick's classic sore loser exit demonstrated why he is universally despised, completely without class. not to mention Brady's remarks of the Giants defensive "schemes" ....instead of the sour grapes, give credit where credit is due...they beat him up and shut him down, exactly what was needed to win The media hype of Brady being in the same league as T. Bradshaw and J. Montana .....those guys knew how to deliver the goods in those situations. The Giants did good !!
Posted on: 2008/2/5 14:02
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:ROLL CALL !!! |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
aaarrrr
Posted on: 2008/1/30 2:57
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Home audio Gurus? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
Anything on laser TV? How far out is it. http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/006226.html mitsubischi claims 08 (above from las vegas) sony supposedly had one at the CES as well, the benifits of better resolution, bigger screen sizes should be good, and twice the color gamut are a couple of the claims Ive read. somthing I just saw: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DS6wsJRGqnQ
Posted on: 2008/1/30 2:21
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Home audio Gurus? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
Cool. Is there a point to 1440P outside of huge screens? doesn't seem practical at home. I hear you, upgrading at this point should wait if you have a good system. Currently 1440P is in theory as the potential is there, and maybe a option in the future in flatpanels. I believe this may already exist in the lab, but since sony through its, motion pic. co. and players , panels etc (and the co. that makes them for sony and samsung). won't release something like that until they make back the money from BR compatible 1080p products. 1080P will be around for awhile there are many areas in the hardware that can't quite keep up perfectly yet (smearing, pixualation, line distortion in very fast scenes) not to mention that all the LCD flatties don't use the highest grade panel available ,(mura effect, bad pixels etc.). Resolution can improve , Pioneers newest elite shown at CES, has a resolution of infinity, 9mm screen, and produces 80%more black at idle. Now that is a nice flattie.....so is the ticket lol. But again, setting all of these up is where it's at and ambient light kills any thing set up to 6500 kalvin, room needs to be dedicated at that point , which is why so many like LCD screens.
Posted on: 2008/1/30 2:05
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Home audio Gurus? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
The AUDIO bandwidth is higher on HDMI? I get DTS and the rest on fiber on both my Denons. even 6.1. There are many DTS sources, DTS HD, DTS DIGI, DTS DIGITAL H.RES., DTS MA which need the HDMI from source to processor (all with BRD). Normal DTS ES/ MATRIX, 96/24, neo, will work fine w/opti.from source to processor. The opti on these decks won't process the lossless type HD audio available. YES, the DTS MA i(master audio) uses more bandwidth, the bandwidth available on an HDMI supports audio and video. HDMI cables have a bandwidth available beyond what is currently availble for both audio and video, the total video bandwidth is 1440p and I don't remember the audio currently. The problem with all of this stuff is what mfg.s print in their spec. can be mis- leading, product upgrading , and the mfgs to have new product release bi-yearly (legally). Much that is being released is in need of firmware upgrades, and have glitches etc. Yes I agree money becomes an issue, and the poster is working within a budget. The latest and greatest gets the big tag. It is worse if you spend 500. now and realise that later you would have liked the additonal options, because you have upgraded other areas of your home system. The DTS MA tracks really rock on BRD's. When I bought mine there were only a couple that had this , but pioneer already had the decoders, now most BRD have MA tracks. However, overall at least the prices have gone down since the first panny 40" at 10K.
Posted on: 2008/1/30 1:38
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Home audio Gurus? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
Other than the extra wire, what's the big deal about running audio over fiber? It's just as clean? I don't see spending 100s more for that feature today.... if your using a regular dvd or up vert ... none, I originally ran my set-up that way before going to a good BRP. Bandwidth on an HDMI icable is larger than any other digital cable. With a BRDP like the 95 elite or the panny, you won't be able to use all the audio options (DTS MA etc.). It will depend on what the original disc BR has available most newer are at least 6.1 DTS HD, and Master Audio being the better of the audio availabilities. Of course the AV deck needs to be able to decode the DTS options (all "lossless" digital does not sound the same).
Posted on: 2008/1/30 1:12
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Home audio Gurus? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
lots of real info here:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/ the pioneer 94 lists at 1600, got it for 1065. When I was looking I could not find anything that was able to actually use the HDMI the way it is supposed to be used (audio and video) through an AV properly for less than 1k. All other decks were all passthrough, video no audio the 1508 denon is a passthrough. http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.j ... 77112416170#productdetail 1908 supposedly does: (last review) http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.j ... 77112314235#productdetail
Posted on: 2008/1/30 0:45
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Home audio Gurus? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
my choice was the pioneer elite 94 for an AV reciever, this reciver processes all capabilities available on a BR disc, especially combined w/the pioneer elite 95 BRDP . The 94 av deck will process all of the hd audio including HD-MA, (all DTS available) etc. and 1080p x25fps., 1.3 firmware, and all true 6-7 channel sources using an HDMI cable, etc.etc.. The elitle 95, and the panny are the only 2 BRDP that have the 1.3 firmware and codecs/processing for all DTS audio and 1080p/24, and 60 fps.
There are even better decks that start at around 3500.00 (yamaha 90X (think model number is right), 11.2 channel, 220 rms per channel etc.etc.) but the pioneer elite 94 av deck can be had for right around 1k. The 1017 pioneer is a good passthrough goes for about 400.00 the spec. that deck is very hard to beat. built in 5 band eq, processes most DTS, and is capable of 6-7 channel (depending on source) at 110.watts rms. Most recievers are strictly pass through, and some will actually degrade the signal as it cannot process the signal properly from an HDMI cable, hence the need for most to have an opti for audio. At that point your only gain will be able to put everything on one remote. Spec. sheets from AV. reciever MFG.'s really need to be scrutinised carefully. The ps-3 does not process HD-MA (br-audio) and currently the pioneer and panny are the only ones, combined w/7channel 1.3 frimware, etc.etc..
Posted on: 2008/1/29 17:27
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:HAIER 42 in plasma troubles |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
cheaper and older pasma's have a short lamp life (some as short as 5000 hrs.)and replacing the lamp can cost as much as the set.
I own a 52" sony XBR3 , if I were to buy a plasma ,the Pioneer Elite is the one to have. Yes , want to learn go here: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/
Posted on: 2008/1/29 14:21
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Rolex 24 is on, anyone watching? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
sounds good I will......yours says offline too...running stealth mode are we, lol
Posted on: 2008/1/27 1:24
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Rolex 24 is on, anyone watching? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
lol...actually it helps the vision, now I can actually see better.
I recently treated myself recently w/a new rig for the house.
Posted on: 2008/1/27 1:10
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Mopar/Old time racers....Very cool story.. |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
on a prompt from a friend, (Ron) I thought I would just throw up a couple of pics, some small info stuff.......next thing I know I've got people emailing me from around the world, and having to tell some; "how could they post sites w/info and they never even saw the car "(or old enough no less), acting like they know everything, and let alone did not own it!!....I know we are all aware of regurgatation on boards, this is at a new height.
Posted on: 2008/1/27 1:04
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Rolex 24 is on, anyone watching? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
hey , chris
yeah...but it's not in televised in HD,
Posted on: 2008/1/27 0:54
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:The great Exodus - an observation |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
There was a thread where someone asked for some help. Someone else referred the C4Guru forum. Then a question was asked, "Is that the one Bogus runs." I answered yes and next thing you know the thread is gone. I have seen a few threads disappear when there is a reference to this forum.. This is the area in which I feel becomes a personal issue and not in the interest of someone becoming more educated in various aspects of these cars. As many might be aware 3rd gen., is perhaps the most comprehensive articles regarding ECM/TUNING tech. Using this as a reference for those interested in learning (as reiteration is usually way to long to post) was/is acceptable on "that" board, and never put anyones panties in a bunch. However, mentioning another board who someone/mods doesn't like, is then a problem ?.... The premise of rule enforcing, including rule siting becomes suspect if in fact the action demonstrates a subjective viewpoint or non-equal application/enforecment of the stated rule/s. Categorizing a statement/post does not always work, as it may only be an attempt from someone to help with no malice intended. MO
Posted on: 2008/1/8 12:53
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Who Has The Same ID As You Did At That Other Forum? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
[quote]Oh Andy's got it tough. Nearly every day he has to endure sitting on a boat, drinking beer and fishing in south Florida, the poor bastard.
I think I hate him now..... :banghead] lol...that's a rough life.
Posted on: 2008/1/7 15:10
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Who Has The Same ID As You Did At That Other Forum? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Hey C. How are you doin? ...good to hear from you, it's been to long.
how's Andy these days? BTW Ilike the new avitar.... cool. lol, Until recently I been posting very little these days. Good to see that this board is starting to get some C4 guys posting, and hearing from ones that over the last couple years that I have made freinds.
Posted on: 2008/1/6 18:39
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Who Has The Same ID As You Did At That Other Forum? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
Quote:
Hiya, Roach! Hiya d.bag.....at least you don't have 14.4 posts here daily lol is the ole man over here too?
Posted on: 2008/1/5 1:56
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Who Has The Same ID As You Did At That Other Forum? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
same name, different place ....and just a quick hello to all
Posted on: 2008/1/4 16:53
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
RE:Have I been banned also? |
||
|---|---|---|
|
Senior Guru
Joined:
2005/9/17 0:00 From Motor City Madhouse
Posts:
247
|
sounds like the they got a chopping block going on over there....
Posted on: 2008/1/3 14:08
|
|
|
Transfer
|
|
|
