Become a Fan!
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember Me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Who's Online
309 user(s) are online (243 user(s) are browsing Forums)

more...
Guru Dictionary
Print in friendly format Send this term to a friend  Courtesy Timer
With the doors closed and the key off - the windows should still go up/down and the radio plays (1990-1996)....
Supporting Vendors
Platinum
Mid America Motorworks
Mid America Motorworks FREE CATALOG


Gold
FIC 770-888-1662


Registered Vendors
Guru Friends
Supporting Banners

TIRERACK.com - Revolutionizing Tire Buying


Shop for Winter Tires Now!




Support This Site
   All Posts (lltrevino)




Re: Fix one thing... and the car runs crappy again...
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
Fuel pressure drop problem is where I would look. Either sticky injector, of bad fuel regulator is my vote.Diagnosis is in order.Clamp the fuel lines test, will tell you alot. Obviously pressure line clamp only, than clamp return line only. If memory serves right, and pressure holds when return is clamped, FPR is culprit. Check Manual, has test in it. Also could pull the rails, and energize pressure and check for leaky injector.

Problem more on a cold start???/

Posted on: 2011/11/20 17:27
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: ZF6 6 Speed Conversion
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
recieved the postal money orders today, so it is SOLD.

I tried a coule of air cargo depots, it must be some gov't law that you are a licensed shipper???? This is new to me.

Posted on: 2011/10/18 21:36
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: ZF6 6 Speed Conversion
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
sorry been away. Right now I have a serious buyer interested. Until the funds are received I dont count my chickens. However claim is funds are in the mail. Imagine what shipping is from Slinger wi, to Anchorage Alaska????? It ain't cheap. 505 insured 5 day delivery.

Posted on: 2011/10/18 15:25
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: ZF6 6 Speed Conversion
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
item is sold, THANKS

Posted on: 2011/10/11 2:17
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Want parts, here ya go
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
Still available? I will take em, if so. email me nascarwrench@yahoo.com

Posted on: 2011/9/5 23:16
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: ZF6 6 Speed Conversion
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
Quote:

88BlackZ51 wrote:
is this everything to convert 4 plus 3 to ZF?

i would put it up on the cf as well.....


I was going to convert my 4+3 to this, YES everything is here to convert, except a thow out bearing (release bearing)
I am even including the correct speedo gear for the 4+3 factory gear ratio 3.07, however the zf6 factory original car gear ratio (3.45) is in the tranny currently.

Believe me, it is killing me to sell this, but I need the money.

Posted on: 2011/9/5 21:35
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


ZF6 6 Speed Conversion
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
Item is SOLD, THANKS GURU

Posted on: 2011/9/5 15:53
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: oil in opti......
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
Quote:

pr0zac wrote:
Quote:

BrianCunningham wrote:
they both go into the manifold

i am aware that both go into the manifold but that in no way breaks down or explains anything you posted

Posted on: 2010/1/19 5:47
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Car is driving me crazy: Engine tuning troubles (with a carb)
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
I agree with CC, 24 * with advance included, I was not figuring in the mechanical advance. I was doing the old school Method, hell I can throw the advance light on, I already know @ 2000rpm 's I am getting almost a full 38* degrees TOTAL TIMING. Tomorrow, I will throw the advance light on it, report my findings. Pretty bad over the weekend, I smoked a mustang with my plowtruck, up to 60 miles an hour, of course he would of had me beyond that, but I was in 4 wheel drive, and he could not man up to it 93 mustang being beat once, so I did it 3 times. anyways, I can tell you though I had a horrible loss of torque before I used the power tune method. My engine did not like anything beyond 16* initial NONADVANCED TIMING. sounded like garbage, and was not running right. Trust me you will know when you go too much advance, the problem is, carbs dont have a knock sensor to retard the timing, even when the inaudible knock does happen. I always error on the side of safety here.

Posted on: 2009/12/4 2:53
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Car is driving me crazy: Engine tuning troubles (with a carb)
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
i am tossed between 10* and 12* initial. If your going to 24* initial AT IDLE SPEED, vacuum advance unplugged and carb ported vacuum port plugged, and your engine restarts normally, something is wrong, your balancer timing orientation is off!

Posted on: 2009/12/3 18:43
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Car is driving me crazy: Engine tuning troubles (with a carb)
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
ported vacuum source on a holley is designed for a "lean cruise" if you can understand that. Meaning, weak at idle, strong at cruise, and weak at WOT. This is so for fuel mileage along with performance. At hoghway speeds 45* + in timing is not that uncommon, with light load. i ALWAYS USE THIS PORT. Oh and by the way, they do make a 7.5" power valve.

Now I would highly recommend a cheap Mr.Gasket distributor recurve kit. I used offset color springs, however I can not recall whitch colors I ended up with, along with what offset in stops.
. Also my base start with vacuum canister was as follows,however only really start playing with this after you get WOT in the pall bark, I completely turned counter-clockwise, than went 4 full turns in. I DID THIS ADJUSTEMENT PRIOR TO PLAYING WITH SPRINGS, THIS WAS THE FIRST ADJUSTMENT ON dIZZY I DID DO. I tried there, THAN SCREWED WITH THE WEIGHTS.

And after 2 weeks of tuning, after countless times removing cap, and other trial and error, I may off went like approximately and additional 1.5 turns on the vacuum advance. this is were I am at, again this was for my snowplow truck. with that engine, th400, 4.56 gears and 36" tall tires. Call it what you will with that cam, I expected a dog till 3000 rpns with torque, however, after tuning I am now pleased.

Posted on: 2009/12/3 15:52
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Car is driving me crazy: Engine tuning troubles (with a carb)
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
with 15 inches of vacuum would not a 7.5 powervalve be better? my rule of thumb was, 1/2 of idle vacuum.

Also, does your distributor have vacuum advance? I assume, can you adjust your vacuum advance, by inserting a 3/32 hex wrench in the vacuum tube fitting? Its been about 10 years till 2 weeks ago since I tuned a carb, however I always did the power tune method. I use to advance it till ping than retard it. I use to start with dizzy weights, and finished with the vacuum advance.

Just went through this pain in my plow truck, 10-1 355 sbc way over cammed 292 comp cam. took 2 weeks after work to get it right, included 3 carbs, and finally rebuilding the originally carb. I feel your pain. I did find 10* initial was the sweet spot also.

Posted on: 2009/12/2 3:43
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Engine swap on the C1
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
Quote:

BeachBum wrote:
Quote:

lltrevino wrote:
You know a cnc is going to the exact same spot, every time.



The only thing I will add to this dilema is that the above statement is very far from the truth.... there are so many variables with a CNC machine that its incredible..... Operator error is by far and away the most common mistake made on a CNC machine. In addition, most CNC machines have a considerably amount of positioning error in them as they sit.

In the metalworking industry, there is a certain amount of scrap that is tolerated and actually built into the quoting they do. The scrap is generated by a wide variety of means, but all have to do with the CNC machine not doing what they were hoping it was going to do. In your situation, its sounds like the program itself is okay considering it has run other same brand cylinder heads successful, but keep in the G-code program they utilize for the path is simply just that, a programmed tool path. But, then a lot of good things have to happen for the CNC machine to actually follow that path.

The most common operator error is the loading of the offsets, you have multiple offsets for most CNC programs, in the case of a cylinder head, it can literally be a dozen or more. Starting with the correct tool offset, the operator has to touch the tool off and then load that length offset into the tool table either manually or automatically. Then they have to remember to enter in the tool radius. If the tool was previously set-up, has anybody changed that tool in the tool changer? and if yes, did they accidently put in the wrong tool in either length or diameter.... for example, a very, very common mistake is for the operator to change a worn out tool in the ATC, and puts in the correct type of mill such as an end-mill, but doesn't notice that he put in a 3/8" diameter tool rather than a 1/4"..... which means he has to manually change that diameter in the tool table after he touches off for the tool length, if he forgets, then the entire cnc program will be off by that amount, Ie meaning, the cut is too deep or too shallow.

Same goes with the work offsets, the corner of that cylinder head may be one offset, then the actually corner entry into the port may be another... they have to call the correct work zero offsets and hope they were correctly entered in the first time. Unless they have the perfect part fixtures, these will change from cylinder head to cylinder head..... and regardless, they should be reset for each cylinder head anyway, which requires the operator to re-touch off or probe the corners. To give you an example of what happens when a work offset is off, the path will be shifted over the value of the offset error, meaning, typically you will cut too deep on one side of the port, and you'll cut air on the other side.

What makes this that much more difficult, on a cylinder head, the cnc program is typically not one long part program based upon one offset, but instead, they'll do a port, step over, call the new offset, and then repeat the program, which is typically a subroutine they are calling. When using this method, an indication that an individual offset for a port was off is that one port is clearly damaged, but the others appear to be generally okay. (The good news about a work offset, is that if the machine has a good home reference, each offset is un-related to the other, thus you do not have a domino effect.)

There are many, many other operator errors that can and do damage parts everyday, plus there are many CNC machine set-up parameters & compensation that must be set-up correctly or the machine will not be acurate. In fact, most CNC machines utilize a rotary encoder for positional feedback, this alone is a big problem considering 90%+ of these are directly mounted on the Servo Motor..... thus, it does not take backlash, screw error or cross compensation into effect.... it instead reports the position of the axes as per the motor vs the actual table position. The more expensive option of Linear Encoders will vastly improve this situation, but due to the added expense, most CNC machining centers do not have them.



The above errors account for literally Billions of dollars in losses that are pretty much deemed acceptable every year to Manufacturers of all types of widgets..... just the nature of the game in the machining business. CNC manufacturers are constantly in competition with each other on how to make a CNC easier and more fool proof.... but alas, its always an uphill battle.

Having said that, with your particular situation, I have no idea what happened.... I'm just saying, keep an open mind and also do not for a second put your total faith in a CNC machine..... I think without a doubt the most common technical phone call that a CNC machine manufacturer receives from their customers is " Help !... my CNC machine will not repeat !"

Good luck with a decent resolution.


In part i absolutely agree with your post. However, I am adding an attatchment of a screenshot, form another forum , on March, 2007. This is a response to a post, with an individual, with a similiar problem as mine. Please note the response to the quote. I think this speak volumes, on the case, the MFG was quite well aware of a problem, And they do not care about the consumer. Instead, my interpetation is, come and purchase another set of our newly redesigned, hoping not to have any more problem product.
I bought a set of new cylinder heads, used for 2500 miles, and people are treating this like an 1100 dollar set of spark plugs. Hey try a new set of plugs.

Attach file:



jpg  afr3.jpg (182.86 KB)
1801_492ac33a537d3.jpg 1024X768 px

Posted on: 2008/11/24 15:11
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Engine swap on the C1
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
No matter what would of happened,I would notbe able to port these heads. The porting shop, waived the 600.00 fee, obviously. The PORTING SHOP than got me a reasonable comparing head, for a killer deal.
My castings were flawed, since they were manufactured. This was common, after I did some research. I did get one hole repaired, however The other hole, is in a spot were only jb weld could be applied. No angle for a tig welder, I am a certified, mig / tig welder, trust me , if there was any chance, I would do it. Same fixture, machine, and program, produced many, many good heads, the water jackets, being shifted was a notorious problem, 3 years ago. One would be amazed, how many bad sets of heads are out there. I have read at least 5 others, with the same problem. I mean, I think, since the castings were acknowledged, to have been problematic, by there own customer service reps, there should be something for the consumer here. Heck, I would settle for a good discount. I think there action of correcting the manufacturing problem, than there lack of action of correcting the consumer that had the defective products, would hurt there sells. however, I guess, with as many of bad heads out there, of this design, this company would of went belly-up, and never released , by there definition, "holy grail" eliminator series.
by the way,the last I checked, I still had a function account over there, FOR NOW.

Posted on: 2008/11/15 5:29
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Engine swap on the C1
Guru Newb
Joined:
2008/10/29 23:18
From Slinger, WI
Posts: 17
Offline
lord nows, I am in a similar fight with another head manufacturer, also.

long story short, I bought a new a*r 195 set of heads, and used them 2 months, I put on about 2500 miles. Winter came, I decided i wanted to upgrade from a 355 to a 406 short block. I took my like new A*R heads, to a highly respected shop ( Kippley Engines), I set up a cnc port n polish. well long story short I had a couple of swiss cheese spots in my runners, from the "core shift" that was common with these heads. That same cnc program later has run 10+ same cylinder geads without a hiccup, and they must of ran 30 + prior to my set of heads. You know a cnc is going to the exact same spot, every time. This was all prior to the holy grail of the "el*m*nator". Now i contact A*R numerous times, and they stated"aware of problem, and problem has been corrected" , however my problem is my own fault. I than last week asked a A*R engineer about my Dilema, and here was his response "

"That's kinda what I thought went down from reading a little of what you posted.

Consider this.....what if the place your head broke thru was always say .040 thick on most of the other castings....none of them would break thru but ALL of them would be extremely thin and long term reliability would always be an issue.

We guarantee our heads with our CNC work because we go thru all the extra trouble to cut our heads like a loaf of bread and make sure we have plenty of aluminum around our port walls based on the shape we CNC into the head (the water jackets are designed around our port designs....not someone else's)

AFR can not be responsible for another shops CNC program that obviously removes alot more material than we do in certain areas. It was up to them to do all the behind the scenes homework that we have invested in our own program (concerning verifying proper wall thickness) and they should have stepped up to the plate and offered you another one of their CNC castings in the event they couldn't weld/repair the one THEIR program broke thru.

That's what we would have done had you purchased our CNC program and had a problem with a port breaking thru into water. You should vent your frustration to the shop that did the CNC work.

How can you reasonably expect us to guarantee someone else's porting work....its no different than if someone buys our heads and grinds on them by hand poking a hole thru one of the ports. In that same situation would you expect AFR to eat the cost of a head and all the machine work involved?? Then think for a minute whats really different in your situation....just because they CNC'ed the same program before doesn't mean it was always right and the bottom line is with most products that you purchase, both performance related and anything else for that matter....if you modify it and have a problem you own it. You relinquish the right to return or warranty it....especially if what you modified created the problem.

What I would be willing to do just to try and help is to see if I can fix it for you and charge you a nominal fee to do so (basically do the work at cost). Perhaps we can repair them but of course I cant make you any promises.

Honestly though, the real company that needs to step up here is the company that did the CNC work. If you conducted a poll and shared this situation with everyone, I bet 75% plus would agree with what I'm saying....maybe more.

We are a stand up company and will warranty anything that we feel is remotely our fault....even gray area's that occasionally come up we stand behind, but this clearly is not a warranty with our company....the real warranty lies with the company that you paid to port your heads. I hope one day you step back and can see and understand that more clearly.

I would like to see if we can fix the heads....contact me next week if your interested in pursuing that.

Thanks,
Tony
661-705-8508



Quote:
Originally Posted by lltrevino
I took my pill, to be respectable here, but here is a real short. these heads were just prior to eliminator release. I will gather receipts, and extra. first we are talking cnc porting, done by Kippley engines, in WI. I am sure Tony has heard of Kippley. I bought heads from Nickerson Engines BRAND NEW. ran heads for UNDER 2500 miles on a stout 355, than over winter, got a deal on a 406 short block, had headS cnc ported, SAME PROGRAM USED ON 30 + SETS OF AFR HEADS. went through on 2 water jackets, 1 hole is unrepairable,. Tony you know bout cnc machines, they go same place, same time, rest assured cnc machine was not crashed, not wrong with program either, did at least 10 sets afterwards, no problems. HOWEVER 2 MONTHS PRIOR, Kippley has a similar problem, core shift. I not trying to be an ahole here, however my money is as green as yours, and having 1100.00 in a set of heads that are junk, really pisses me off. I have the email responses, and was in contact with sustomer service. WILL NOT ACCEPT A RETURN!!! how is this fair to me?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
Mike,

I have not ignored this customer. Ignoring implies there has been an effort made to communicate with me and this customer has not PM'ed me, nor has he picked up the phone in an attempt to contact me either. I make myself available to everyone.

The only thing I know about this situation is from what I have briefly read (and Im a little gray on this) which involves the fact this customer modified our castings by having someone else port them (and I believe broke into a water jacket which he now blames us for). This type of work obviously nullifies any warranty AFR can offer which would be standard procedure for anybody's product (if I buy a Dart block and grind and modify it to the point it creates a problem I wouldn't expect Dart to warranty to the block because it was my fault for modifying it in the first place....just an example of the point I am making)

That said I would like to hear the specific details of what actually went down and I encourage thic customer to contact me directly. I would like to try and work something out in an attempt to make peace but without knowing exactly what Im dealing with its hard to say what AFR may or may not be willing to do to help out.

My phone is 661-705-8508 or a PM would also be fine but I prefer we speak on the phone at this point.

Thanks,
Tony


Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Chef
I will send your PM directly to Tony.

Tony: Please handle things with this gentleman and include me in your correspondence. If you need an Email, I can provide one. Per forum rules, if this cannot be resolved between you two, he will be entitled to start a thread about it.

Thanks,

Mike
Iron Chef
Moderator


Quote:
Originally Posted by lltrevino
I AM IN NO WAY TRYING TO PICK A FIGHT, FIRST OFF!!! however, according to a post I just read, people come to this forum to read, and write about experiences with a said vendor. My question is, how do I share the information of a vendor selling an 1100 dollar product, that has flawed castings? I have a set of 2 month od, at the time) core-shifted afr heads ( common problem), that when I contacted customer service @ AFR, I was advised, " AFR was stopping flawed castings from reaching the consumer" . however AFR was not doing anything for the consumer, whom already has this product, whom lost 1100.00?????? every time I talk with Tony, I am ignored, just enhances my point further, dont you think???z well let me know, however I am not looking for a suspension or ban, however I want to share my $1,100+experience!!!!! "

Posted on: 2008/11/15 4:18
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer



 Top




CorvetteForum.guru is independently owned and operated. This site is not associated with or financially supported by General Motors.

Copyright 2008-2015 CorvetteForum.guru

CorvetteForum.guru is a Guru Garage Site (Coming Soon!)

If you have any questions about our site, please contact us at Andy@corvetteforum.guru.

Powered by XOOPS 2.56 Copyright 2001-2014 www.xoops.org

Hosted by GoDaddy.com.