Become a Fan!
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember Me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Who's Online
241 user(s) are online (193 user(s) are browsing Forums)

more...
Guru Dictionary
Print in friendly format Send this term to a friend  LT4
Engine used in 1996, all manual equipped cars came with this engine....
Supporting Vendors
Platinum
Mid America Motorworks
Mid America Motorworks FREE CATALOG


Gold
FIC 770-888-1662


Registered Vendors
Guru Friends
Supporting Banners

TIRERACK.com - Revolutionizing Tire Buying


Shop for Winter Tires Now!




Support This Site
 Register To Post

teebee 94 LT1 running rough
2014 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Lakin, Kansas 67860
12382 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/16 0:00



Offline
OK, I've tried to find the cause and fix this issue, but it's getting to me now. Here's the Cliff Notes version.

After a long week long trip (3000 miles) I started to have a miss at idle only in drive (auto). sometimes when it misses it shakes the whole car, sometimes it just slightly noticeable. Only when in gear and only at idle. If I rev up just past idle 800-900 RPM stumble goes away. (mades me think IAC, but why only under load?)

Here's what I have done/checked:

#1 no SES light and have checked, No codes set either in History or Current.

#2 I have changed Fuel Filter, opti, plugs, wires, WP, Injectors all within the last 6k miles

#3 Cleaned TB and MAF within the last 8K.

#4 Removed and cleaned IAC and EGR.

After performing these things I thought the miss was gone, but on the next outing it came back. All the way down she runs pretty good, maybe a touch warmer than usual (200-205). I get about 140 miles from home and going through a town the little miss at idle in gear starts again (not bad but I can feel it). I get back in to head home, the little miss is back. No biggie when I have to stop I just kick it in neutral, then once I get it going again she's alright, but as I get further down the road the worse she runs rough, pinging, bucking at times. And when all this is going on the temps start to climb (up to 230). Once I get it up to cruising speed she kind of smooths out, but don't step on the gas (as in passing) as it starts pinging and bucking and the temps start up again. Once I get in to a cruise mode the temps will come down some (215 -220). I have made it home (170 miles) and she is running like cr@p.
(indicating lean condition...yes?)

I take fuel pressure readings and find 41-42# at idle maybe dipping below 40 at times. Drops below 40 at times when I rev the engine. So I think that the FP is about to Cr@p out, I order a new FP (GM) and filter. Install them and in the process of changing the filter I find that my #8 spark plug is just finger tight (no-one to blame for that except my self). Thinking that I found the miss issue I tighten up the plug. Also after changing the FP and filter, Fuel pressure readings are just like before.

So I decided to scan the computer. My first data scan is below.
Trouble Codes
43 Electronic Spark Control failure
Pending Codes

1 Desired Idle 600.00 RPM
2 Engine RPM 550.00 RPM
3 Coolant Temp 194.90 °F
4 Oil Temp 142.20 °F
5 Manifold Air Tmp 92.30 °F
6 A/C Pressure 156.00 PSI
7 MAP Sensor 2.23 Volts
8 Throttle Sensor 0.58 Volts
9 Throttle Angle 0.00 %
10 Battery Voltage 12.4 Volts
11 Barometric Press 4.35 Volts
12 Left O2 Sensor 1007.00 mVolts
13 Right O2 Sensor 906.00 mVolts
14 Block Learn Cell 16.00
15 Left Block Learn value 140.00
16 Right Block Learn value 153.00
17 Left Integrator value 128.00
18 Right Integrator value 128.00
19 Left Inj Pulse 6.60 mS
20 Injector Pulse 7.20 mS
21 Mass Air Flow 8.00 gr/sec
22 CCP Duty Cycle 0.00 %
23 Idle Air Mtr Pos 53.00 steps
24 Learned Idle Pos 34.00 steps
25 Spark Advance 14.00 °
26 Knock Retard 7.00 °
27 Knock Sensor 22.00
28 EGR Duty Cycle 0.00 %


So I get the FSM out and follow the flow chart and find the left Knock sensor is way out of range, so I replace it. Still no love.

Next data scan:

Trouble Codes
43 Electronic Spark Control failure
Pending Codes

Operational Data
1 Desired Idle 712.00 RPM
2 Engine RPM 650.00 RPM
3 Coolant Temp 150.30 °F
4 Oil Temp 92.30 °F
5 Manifold Air Tmp 86.90 °F
6 A/C Pressure 139.00 PSI
7 MAP Sensor 1.70 Volts
8 Throttle Sensor 0.58 Volts
9 Throttle Angle 0.00 %
10 Battery Voltage 13.60 Volts
11 Barometric Press 4.35 Volts
12 Left O2 Sensor 1003.00 mVolts
13 Right O2 Sensor 862.00 mVolts
14 Block Learn Cell 16.00
15 Left Block Learn value 140.00
16 Right Block Learn value 153.00
17 Left Integrator value 128.00
18 Right Integrator value 128.00
19 Left Inj Pulse 5.80 mS
20 Injector Pulse 6.30 mS
21 Mass Air Flow 8.00 gr/sec
22 CCP Duty Cycle 0.00 %
23 Idle Air Mtr Pos 51.00 steps
24 Learned Idle Pos 34.00 steps
25 Spark Advance 20.00 °
26 Knock Retard 1.00 °
27 Knock Sensor 22.00
28 EGR Duty Cycle 0.00 %

I am then told to check all the connections for the ignition system (Opti, coil, etc) and to check all the vaccum lines. Which I do and I actually replace some of the vacuum lines out. It runs better, doesn't miss quite so bad, but still not right.

Here is the last data scan I did. I did this one with the engine revved a little (about 1700 rpm)

Desired Idle (RPM) 675 675 675 675
Engine RPM (RPM) 1775 1775 1775 1775
Coolant Temp (°F) 192.2 192.2 192.2 192.2
Oil Temp (°F) 155.7 155.7 155.7 155.7
Manifold Air Tmp (°F) 90.9 90.9 90.9 90.9
A/C Pressure (PSI) 75 75 77 77
MAP Sensor (Volts) 0.82 0.8 0.84 0.8
Throttle Sensor (Volts) 0.72 0.7 0.72 0.72
Throttle Angle (%) 3 3 3 3
Battery Voltage (Volts) 13.7 13.7 13.6 13.6
Barometric Press (Volts) 4.33 4.33 4.33 4.33
Left O2 Sensor (mVolts) 950 893 893 897
Right O2 Sensor (mVolts) 206 418 224 79

Block Learn Cell 17 17 17 17
Left Block Learn value 129 129 129 129
Right Block Learn value 129 129 129 129 Left
Integrator value 128 128 128 128

Right Integrator value 138 133 137 134
Left Inj Pulse (mS) 3 3 3 3
Injector Pulse (mS) 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.1
Mass Air Flow (gr/sec) 13 13 13 13
CCP Duty Cycle (%) 0 0 0 0
Idle Air Mtr Pos (steps) 24 24 24 24
Learned Idle Pos (steps) 21 21 21 21
Spark Advance (°) 36 36 37 36
Knock Retard (°) 0 0 0 0
Knock Sensor 182 182 182 182
EGR Duty Cycle (%) 0 0 0 0

The things that seem to stand out I highlighted. The readings are 1/2 second intervals.

I am still getting the code 43 after it goes into closed loop.
Posted on: 2008/8/17 20:26
_________________
2007 Atomic Orange 3LT coupe. Borla Exhaust

One of Americas' proud Deplorable

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
Whew! Thanks for Cliffin'!

Did you do the FSM diagnostic for 43 spark control fault when the motor was HOT?
Posted on: 2008/8/18 4:25
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

teebee Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2014 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Lakin, Kansas 67860
12382 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/16 0:00



Offline
No the engine was not hot......are you thinking that the higher temps might make a difference on the ohms readings I am getting?

Hummmmm, interesting thought. I just came in again from checking the KS again (cold) and they were right in the middle of the specs 3800 and 3900(left and right respectively)

Yea, I know about the cliffs, but it truly was the cliffnote version.

I'm thinking after all the things I've done, battery disconnected off and on. Maybe since it is running better, maybe I need to take it out and drive it some and let the computer re-learn. Maybe?
Posted on: 2008/8/20 2:56
_________________
2007 Atomic Orange 3LT coupe. Borla Exhaust

One of Americas' proud Deplorable

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
Quote:

teebee1994 wrote:
No the engine was not hot......are you thinking that the higher temps might make a difference on the ohms readings I am getting?


Could be; I'm thinkin' a circuit might be exhibiting a fault only when ALL circuits are active - closed loop, like a heat stressed sensor/module/relay, or frayed/chafed insulation...

Quote:



Maybe since it is running better, maybe I need to take it out and drive it some and let the computer re-learn. Maybe?


Possible, but I doubt it. If it is a re-programming, such as shift points re-learning, after disconnecting TPS with ignition 'on' (I once did this), then the problem might be solved.

I'd rather find a physical fault tho', just to KNOW the problem...
Posted on: 2008/8/20 3:05
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Senior Guru
446 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 9:08



Offline
Teebee, just curious as to whether you found the answer or not. I'm having similar issues on my '96.
Posted on: 2008/10/6 19:25
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

biggrizzly Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2011 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Chesapeake Beach, Maryland
4543 Posts
Member since:
2006/4/23 0:00



Offline
Weav,

Did you replace knock sensors? I replaced mine when I rebuilt the top end, and wound up ordering the wrong knock sensors from a part no. I found on CF.
Although the sensors are essentially the same, they are different impedence values for OBD1 and OBDII. When I had the 96 knock sensors installed I was getting all kinds of knock values and retarded timing below 1000 rpm on my data logs.

Just a thought
Don
Posted on: 2008/10/6 21:25
_________________
Don Haller
Corvette Club of America
94Coupe, 383Stroka, PeteK Trans, 3000stall, 3.54rear, Konis and bigger sways.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

BrianCunningham Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Senior Guru
Boston, MA for the most part :)
7763 Posts
Member since:
2007/12/30 0:00



Offline
Have you checked the coil and the ignition module?

How about the harness itself?

The connectors been known to go bad.
Posted on: 2008/10/6 21:59
_________________
Polo Green 95 LT1 6-spd http://mysite.verizon.net/vzevcp74/
383 LT1/Vortech Supercharger/AFR heads/Rod end suspension/Penske-Hardbar dual rate coilovers/Wilwood 6pot brakes
NCCC Governor: http://BayStateCorvetteClub.com
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

tjpreul Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
Columbia, MO
1103 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 18:12



Offline
When you followed the flow chart for code 43, what voltages did you get from the ECM. Also did both knock sensors ohm between 3.3k-4.5k, from terminal to ground.
Posted on: 2008/10/7 1:22
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Senior Guru
446 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 9:08



Offline
Quote:

biggrizzly wrote:
Weav,

Did you replace knock sensors? I replaced mine when I rebuilt the top end, and wound up ordering the wrong knock sensors from a part no. I found on CF.
Although the sensors are essentially the same, they are different impedence values for OBD1 and OBDII. When I had the 96 knock sensors installed I was getting all kinds of knock values and retarded timing below 1000 rpm on my data logs.

Just a thought
Don


I have not replaced the KS. As far as I know they are OE. I was getting crazy knock counts but I found a plug that wasn't making a good ground because of to much anti seize on it. Fixing that has leveled them out. I do get negative spark readings but I think that is a scanner software issue.




Quote:

BrianCunningham wrote:
Have you checked the coil and the ignition module?

How about the harness itself?

The connectors been known to go bad.


The coil is new. I'm not sure about the ICM. Although I did have heat related issues back in the summer when it was extremely hot. I've been under the weather the last two weeks so I haven't felt like looking into the harness. This all started when I changed out the torque converter. I think I've narrowed it down to a slight leak on the right side exhaust at the manifold or a iffy ground on the left side of the trans. Could be my tune but that is probably last on the list.
Posted on: 2008/10/8 8:48
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Senior Guru
446 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 9:08



Offline
Also, when the A/C is on the car idles fine. A lot faster but smooth. Normal idle is around 550 rpm. It's around 800 rpm or better with the A/C on. I do not have a Tech I so I'll have to get it to my mechanic to check out the ASR/throttle adjustment. Without the A/C on it has a nasty lope at idle after it warms up good. FP is good. 39 @ idle and goes to 48 or so on acceleration. Holds it's own after shutdown.
Posted on: 2008/10/8 9:07
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
Quote:

Weavsvet wrote:
Also, when the A/C is on the car idles fine. A lot faster but smooth. Normal idle is around 550 rpm. It's around 800 rpm or better with the A/C on. I do not have a Tech I so I'll have to get it to my mechanic to check out the ASR/throttle adjustment. Without the A/C on it has a nasty lope at idle after it warms up good. FP is good. 39 @ idle and goes to 48 or so on acceleration. Holds it's own after shutdown.


Lopin' idle is an air issue; gotta' be a vacuum leak somewhere.

Block the TB linkage, brick on pedal, anything to get a steady idle (DON'T rely on A/C for this steady idle, for this test!), then start sprayin' startin' fluid EVERYWHERE, a little at a time, to find where it's gettin' sucked in, and causin' a brief rev increase.

Vac leak will make a engine lope idle - 20 year old lawn mower, or a new car on the lot...
Posted on: 2008/10/8 13:30
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Senior Guru
446 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 9:08



Offline
Quote:

Blade_1 wrote:
Quote:

Weavsvet wrote:
Also, when the A/C is on the car idles fine. A lot faster but smooth. Normal idle is around 550 rpm. It's around 800 rpm or better with the A/C on. I do not have a Tech I so I'll have to get it to my mechanic to check out the ASR/throttle adjustment. Without the A/C on it has a nasty lope at idle after it warms up good. FP is good. 39 @ idle and goes to 48 or so on acceleration. Holds it's own after shutdown.


Lopin' idle is an air issue; gotta' be a vacuum leak somewhere.

Block the TB linkage, brick on pedal, anything to get a steady idle (DON'T rely on A/C for this steady idle, for this test!), then start sprayin' startin' fluid EVERYWHERE, a little at a time, to find where it's gettin' sucked in, and causin' a brief rev increase.

Vac leak will make a engine lope idle - 20 year old lawn mower, or a new car on the lot...


I had tried the starting fluid thing but only with the engine idleing. I'll give it another try. Thanks!
Posted on: 2008/10/8 16:27
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Senior Guru
446 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 9:08



Offline
I tried the starting fluid as Blade suggested.

I got a little rev from around the IAC. It seemed to be erratic though. It may have been getting in around the intake boot on the TB. I snugged all that up but no difference. If there is another leak I can't find it! Does the IAC have a gasket? I replaced it a while back but I don't remember one being supplied with the new one.
Posted on: 2008/10/8 22:34
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
Quote:

Weavsvet wrote:
I tried the starting fluid as Blade suggested.

I got a little rev from around the IAC. It seemed to be erratic though. It may have been getting in around the intake boot on the TB. I snugged all that up but no difference. If there is another leak I can't find it! Does the IAC have a gasket? I replaced it a while back but I don't remember one being supplied with the new one.


Yeah, there is an IAC gasket. I suppose it can degrade/break down...

That's really interesting... If the revs were steady, COMPLETELY, and they increased with some spray, every time, then there HAS TO be a leak there.

Try a book of matches. Light the whole book, blow 'em out quick while the match heads are burnin', and see if the smoke feeds into some spot...
Posted on: 2008/10/9 3:18
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Senior Guru
446 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 9:08



Offline
I found what was causing my rough idle.
The only gasket the IAC has is a O ring. Mine was broken. Fixed that and all is well.

Thanks for all the help.
Posted on: 2008/10/17 19:16
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

BrianCunningham Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Senior Guru
Boston, MA for the most part :)
7763 Posts
Member since:
2007/12/30 0:00



Offline
Sweet!

Glad you got it resolved.
Posted on: 2008/10/17 21:37
_________________
Polo Green 95 LT1 6-spd http://mysite.verizon.net/vzevcp74/
383 LT1/Vortech Supercharger/AFR heads/Rod end suspension/Penske-Hardbar dual rate coilovers/Wilwood 6pot brakes
NCCC Governor: http://BayStateCorvetteClub.com
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

bogus Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Grand Imperial Pooh-Bah
San Pedro, CA
20859 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/7 0:00



Offline
wow. talk about a needle in a haystack!!!

Great find!!!
Posted on: 2008/10/19 19:14
_________________
The single biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place. - George Bernard Shaw

Education is the best tool to overcome irrational fear. - me

Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

teebee Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2014 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Lakin, Kansas 67860
12382 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/16 0:00



Offline
Sorry I've been away so long. To answer some questions....no I hadn't found the answer...I got tired of F'ing with it and took it to a mechanic. He's not a Corvette guy...but basically a good all round ASE certified one man shop. I told him what the symptoms were and what I had done. Left him my printouts of the scans, and my service manuals. At the end of the first day I call him up and he says that the #6 isn't firing at all, and two other cylinders are firing only occasionally. It leads him back to the year and a half old Opti, which he says isn't working (ie no spark coming out of it on the #6 and missing regularly on two others.

"Can we just replace the rotor and cap?" I say "No, I'll just order a new one", says me and I have a new MSD unit on order and it should be here tomorrow.

All the time I have spent chasing my tail. The opti never set a code, and I was convinced that the opti was new and it couldn't be the problem.
Posted on: 2008/10/23 1:16
_________________
2007 Atomic Orange 3LT coupe. Borla Exhaust

One of Americas' proud Deplorable

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

BillH Re: 94 LT1 running rough
The Stig Moderator
Reno
22702 Posts
Member since:
2007/12/25 0:00



Offline
Hope the MSD solves your problems, I'm happy with mine.

I had problems for 3 months before the opti thru a code. The motor would shut off for one second idling thru a parking lot, happened about once a week. And would totally shut off above 4k in closed loop (hot). It would run to redline in open loop. I chased all the fuel and electrical stuff and found nothing.
It finally thru a code after the 3 months.
When I pulled the opti, it was totaled inside.
Posted on: 2008/10/23 13:19
_________________
Every man dies but not every man lives.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

teebee Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2014 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Lakin, Kansas 67860
12382 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/16 0:00



Offline
Well I got the MSD today....wow, what a quality piece. I took it to the mechanic and had a long talk with him, I feel that this will solve my problem.
Posted on: 2008/10/24 3:14
_________________
2007 Atomic Orange 3LT coupe. Borla Exhaust

One of Americas' proud Deplorable

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

biggrizzly Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2011 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Chesapeake Beach, Maryland
4543 Posts
Member since:
2006/4/23 0:00



Offline
Tom,

I agree they seem like a quality item. I have about 500 miles on mine now and so far so good. I did re-apply red Locktite on the rotor screw to make sure it would not come off, and I installed the O-ring with the Opti off the car so I was absolutely sure it was seated correctly before installing the cap. These are two areas that many have screwed up in the past.

Aren't you glad I sent you your puller back now?!!!!

Take Care
Posted on: 2008/10/24 3:47
_________________
Don Haller
Corvette Club of America
94Coupe, 383Stroka, PeteK Trans, 3000stall, 3.54rear, Konis and bigger sways.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Calm Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Senior Guru
Vancouver, Canada
608 Posts
Member since:
2007/12/27 0:00



Offline
Quote:

biggrizzly wrote:
Tom,

I agree they seem like a quality item. I have about 500 miles on mine now and so far so good. I did re-apply red Locktite on the rotor screw to make sure it would not come off, and I installed the O-ring with the Opti off the car so I was absolutely sure it was seated correctly before installing the cap.


Sadly, I did NOT use locktite on my MSD. Rotor blew off within a month!
Posted on: 2008/10/24 4:32
_________________
1995 Forged 385 ZF6 227/234 1.6 FIC30# MSD BBK SS SLP Bullets X-Pipe DynoMax
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Pcolt94 Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Guru Newb
Orlando
31 Posts
Member since:
2008/4/8 13:13



Offline
Most bad opti's do not throw a code. That’s because a code an only be set by what the PCM monitors. Hundred of items can be defective but only a hand full of signals are interrogated or monitored for radical changes. The opti's low resolution signal is monitored but the high voltage and cap functions are not. So if a rotor or cap is causing weak spark or cross spark in the ignition, the engine can have a wide variety of symptoms but no codes.

The low and high resolution pulses from the optical pickup are the very reliable and cause the least amount of problems. Bad bearings can cause problems but not usually on a 2 year old unit.

I was going to suggest pulling the fuel pump assembly and checking the sock and tank for debris and water but since you are replacing the opti lets hope that that takes care of it.
Posted on: 2008/10/28 16:05
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

BillH Re: 94 LT1 running rough
The Stig Moderator
Reno
22702 Posts
Member since:
2007/12/25 0:00



Offline
Quote:

Calm wrote:
Quote:

biggrizzly wrote:
Tom,

I agree they seem like a quality item. I have about 500 miles on mine now and so far so good. I did re-apply red Locktite on the rotor screw to make sure it would not come off, and I installed the O-ring with the Opti off the car so I was absolutely sure it was seated correctly before installing the cap.


Sadly, I did NOT use locktite on my MSD. Rotor blew off within a month!


5k on the MSD with no problems, no loctite. I installed it before I heard about the problems that SpectatorRacing had.
I'm due for an antifreeze change anyway so, I'm going to pull the cap and check/loctite.
Posted on: 2008/10/28 18:51
_________________
Every man dies but not every man lives.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

teebee Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2014 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Lakin, Kansas 67860
12382 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/16 0:00



Offline
Quote:

Pcolt94 wrote:
Most bad opti's do not throw a code. That’s because a code an only be set by what the PCM monitors. Hundred of items can be defective but only a hand full of signals are interrogated or monitored for radical changes. The opti's low resolution signal is monitored but the high voltage and cap functions are not. So if a rotor or cap is causing weak spark or cross spark in the ignition, the engine can have a wide variety of symptoms but no codes.

The low and high resolution pulses from the optical pickup are the very reliable and cause the least amount of problems. Bad bearings can cause problems but not usually on a 2 year old unit.

I was going to suggest pulling the fuel pump assembly and checking the sock and tank for debris and water but since you are replacing the opti lets hope that that takes care of it.


Pcolt94, I replaced the fuel pump/sock early on in this saga. I have a feeling that when it is all said and done, I'll find the cap/rotor screwed up on the GM opti. I could have replaced just the cap and rotor, but I opted for a complete new MSD unit. I'll call my man and have him loctite those rotor screws.

biggrizzly, I have not had to use the puller this time. I took the vette into a mechanic and told him if he needed it I already have one.
Posted on: 2008/10/31 1:03
_________________
2007 Atomic Orange 3LT coupe. Borla Exhaust

One of Americas' proud Deplorable

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
Quote:

teebee1994 wrote:
OK, I've tried to find the cause and fix this issue, but it's getting to me now. Here's the Cliff Notes version.

After a long week long trip (3000 miles) I started to have a miss at idle only in drive (auto). sometimes when it misses it shakes the whole car, sometimes it just slightly noticeable. Only when in gear and only at idle. If I rev up just past idle 800-900 RPM stumble goes away. (mades me think IAC, but why only under load?)

Here's what I have done/checked:

#1 no SES light and have checked, No codes set either in History or Current.

#2 I have changed Fuel Filter, opti, plugs, wires, WP, Injectors all within the last 6k miles

#3 Cleaned TB and MAF within the last 8K.

#4 Removed and cleaned IAC and EGR.

After performing these things I thought the miss was gone, but on the next outing it came back. All the way down she runs pretty good, maybe a touch warmer than usual (200-205). I get about 140 miles from home and going through a town the little miss at idle in gear starts again (not bad but I can feel it). I get back in to head home, the little miss is back. No biggie when I have to stop I just kick it in neutral, then once I get it going again she's alright, but as I get further down the road the worse she runs rough, pinging, bucking at times. And when all this is going on the temps start to climb (up to 230). Once I get it up to cruising speed she kind of smooths out, but don't step on the gas (as in passing) as it starts pinging and bucking and the temps start up again. Once I get in to a cruise mode the temps will come down some (215 -220). I have made it home (170 miles) and she is running like cr@p.
(indicating lean condition...yes?)

I take fuel pressure readings and find 41-42# at idle maybe dipping below 40 at times. Drops below 40 at times when I rev the engine. So I think that the FP is about to Cr@p out, I order a new FP (GM) and filter. Install them and in the process of changing the filter I find that my #8 spark plug is just finger tight (no-one to blame for that except my self). Thinking that I found the miss issue I tighten up the plug. Also after changing the FP and filter, Fuel pressure readings are just like before.

So I decided to scan the computer. My first data scan is below.
Trouble Codes
43 Electronic Spark Control failure
Pending Codes

1 Desired Idle 600.00 RPM
2 Engine RPM 550.00 RPM
3 Coolant Temp 194.90 °F
4 Oil Temp 142.20 °F
5 Manifold Air Tmp 92.30 °F
6 A/C Pressure 156.00 PSI
7 MAP Sensor 2.23 Volts
8 Throttle Sensor 0.58 Volts
9 Throttle Angle 0.00 %
10 Battery Voltage 12.4 Volts
11 Barometric Press 4.35 Volts
12 Left O2 Sensor 1007.00 mVolts
13 Right O2 Sensor 906.00 mVolts
14 Block Learn Cell 16.00
15 Left Block Learn value 140.00
16 Right Block Learn value 153.00
17 Left Integrator value 128.00
18 Right Integrator value 128.00
19 Left Inj Pulse 6.60 mS
20 Injector Pulse 7.20 mS
21 Mass Air Flow 8.00 gr/sec
22 CCP Duty Cycle 0.00 %
23 Idle Air Mtr Pos 53.00 steps
24 Learned Idle Pos 34.00 steps
25 Spark Advance 14.00 °
26 Knock Retard 7.00 °
27 Knock Sensor 22.00
28 EGR Duty Cycle 0.00 %


So I get the FSM out and follow the flow chart and find the left Knock sensor is way out of range, so I replace it. Still no love.

Next data scan:

Trouble Codes
43 Electronic Spark Control failure
Pending Codes

Operational Data
1 Desired Idle 712.00 RPM
2 Engine RPM 650.00 RPM
3 Coolant Temp 150.30 °F
4 Oil Temp 92.30 °F
5 Manifold Air Tmp 86.90 °F
6 A/C Pressure 139.00 PSI
7 MAP Sensor 1.70 Volts
8 Throttle Sensor 0.58 Volts
9 Throttle Angle 0.00 %
10 Battery Voltage 13.60 Volts
11 Barometric Press 4.35 Volts
12 Left O2 Sensor 1003.00 mVolts
13 Right O2 Sensor 862.00 mVolts
14 Block Learn Cell 16.00
15 Left Block Learn value 140.00
16 Right Block Learn value 153.00
17 Left Integrator value 128.00
18 Right Integrator value 128.00
19 Left Inj Pulse 5.80 mS
20 Injector Pulse 6.30 mS
21 Mass Air Flow 8.00 gr/sec
22 CCP Duty Cycle 0.00 %
23 Idle Air Mtr Pos 51.00 steps
24 Learned Idle Pos 34.00 steps
25 Spark Advance 20.00 °
26 Knock Retard 1.00 °
27 Knock Sensor 22.00
28 EGR Duty Cycle 0.00 %

I am then told to check all the connections for the ignition system (Opti, coil, etc) and to check all the vaccum lines. Which I do and I actually replace some of the vacuum lines out. It runs better, doesn't miss quite so bad, but still not right.

Here is the last data scan I did. I did this one with the engine revved a little (about 1700 rpm)

Desired Idle (RPM) 675 675 675 675
Engine RPM (RPM) 1775 1775 1775 1775
Coolant Temp (°F) 192.2 192.2 192.2 192.2
Oil Temp (°F) 155.7 155.7 155.7 155.7
Manifold Air Tmp (°F) 90.9 90.9 90.9 90.9
A/C Pressure (PSI) 75 75 77 77
MAP Sensor (Volts) 0.82 0.8 0.84 0.8
Throttle Sensor (Volts) 0.72 0.7 0.72 0.72
Throttle Angle (%) 3 3 3 3
Battery Voltage (Volts) 13.7 13.7 13.6 13.6
Barometric Press (Volts) 4.33 4.33 4.33 4.33
Left O2 Sensor (mVolts) 950 893 893 897
Right O2 Sensor (mVolts) 206 418 224 79

Block Learn Cell 17 17 17 17
Left Block Learn value 129 129 129 129
Right Block Learn value 129 129 129 129 Left
Integrator value 128 128 128 128

Right Integrator value 138 133 137 134
Left Inj Pulse (mS) 3 3 3 3
Injector Pulse (mS) 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.1
Mass Air Flow (gr/sec) 13 13 13 13
CCP Duty Cycle (%) 0 0 0 0
Idle Air Mtr Pos (steps) 24 24 24 24
Learned Idle Pos (steps) 21 21 21 21
Spark Advance (°) 36 36 37 36
Knock Retard (°) 0 0 0 0
Knock Sensor 182 182 182 182
EGR Duty Cycle (%) 0 0 0 0

The things that seem to stand out I highlighted. The readings are 1/2 second intervals.

I am still getting the code 43 after it goes into closed loop.


I actually scrolled through and read the values this time (as if I can make much of them).

But I noticed there's a 10% difference in the O2 sensor values. Then I noticed the second scan. Same discrepancy 12.5%. And the last scan, over idle, the difference is ten-fold.

Injector pulsewidth measurements are also consistently around 8 - 10% difference left side over right side.

This HAS TO indicate something.

Mark and switch left side and right side injectors, and compare values???

Have you checked the injector baskets for blockage? There's some good pics of basket removal in a post of mine at CF:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/showthread.php?t=2033363

Have you done an OHM reading for all 8? Send them off to Mekanic for a squirt test...
Posted on: 2008/10/31 1:25
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

teebee Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2014 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Lakin, Kansas 67860
12382 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/16 0:00



Offline
I actually installed my old OE injectors back in to no change. During the the trying out of ideas I actually changed some injectors from side to side (ie #8 and #1, #6 and #3) to no change. I am thinking that the bad opti, not giving spark to the #6 cyl and not consistent spark to a couple other cyl caused those numbers to be off.
Posted on: 2008/11/2 0:50
_________________
2007 Atomic Orange 3LT coupe. Borla Exhaust

One of Americas' proud Deplorable

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
AHA... Swap left and right KS's.

You think opti is failing? Does opti govern pulsewidth? I bet it doesn't...

You need source code for pulsewidth determinants, to see if ANYTHING prioritizes one SIDE over another.

Sure would be a good time for some of the know-it-all's, that can't debate something without arguin' what they know, to give the scans a once-over, and do some extrapolatin', and educate the rest of us.
Posted on: 2008/11/2 3:52
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

teebee Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2014 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Lakin, Kansas 67860
12382 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/16 0:00



Offline
Opti has no fire on #6 at all and is sporadically misfiring on at least two other cylinders. I think I need to address that first before we can figure out what else is screwed up.
Posted on: 2008/11/2 13:07
_________________
2007 Atomic Orange 3LT coupe. Borla Exhaust

One of Americas' proud Deplorable

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

teebee Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2014 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Lakin, Kansas 67860
12382 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/16 0:00



Offline
Well, I have my fingers crossed when I say this but, my saga has ended. I got the Vette back today after a long time fighting the issue. It was the opti. Actually the cap and rotor were toast. Don't ask me why, but it is obvious when you look at the inside of the cap that this was my issue. Less than 6000 miles on this genuine GM AC/Delco optispark. I did replace this with an MSD unit, I could have probably gotten by with a new cap and rotor, but I decided that if I was in this far, I wasn't going to take any chances and just replaced the entire unit. Notice the inside of the cap here.
[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v281/toms94/Maintenence/Optispark-Bad002.jpg[/IMG]

So if anyone needs a 6000 mile optispark (that needs a new rotor and cap) drop me a message, maybe I can recoup some of the cost of the MSD unit.

The mechanic also believes that he found the source of my oil leak as well. He said it appeared to have been leaking around the shaft that drives the opti. Seal was good, the shaft was about 15 thousandths smaller than the MSD units shaft. After driving it for about 45 minutes I put it on the lift and checked it and it is dry as can be under there.

Thanks for all who posted with ideas and suggestions.
Posted on: 2008/11/5 4:04
_________________
2007 Atomic Orange 3LT coupe. Borla Exhaust

One of Americas' proud Deplorable

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
Quote:

teebee1994 wrote:
Well, I have my fingers crossed when I say this but, my saga has ended. I got the Vette back today after a long time fighting the issue. It was the opti. Actually the cap and rotor were toast. Don't ask me why, but it is obvious when you look at the inside of the cap that this was my issue. Less than 6000 miles on this genuine GM AC/Delco optispark. I did replace this with an MSD unit, I could have probably gotten by with a new cap and rotor, but I decided that if I was in this far, I wasn't going to take any chances and just replaced the entire unit. Notice the inside of the cap here.
[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v281/toms94/Maintenence/Optispark-Bad002.jpg[/IMG]

So if anyone needs a 6000 mile optispark (that needs a new rotor and cap) drop me a message, maybe I can recoup some of the cost of the MSD unit.

The mechanic also believes that he found the source of my oil leak as well. He said it appeared to have been leaking around the shaft that drives the opti. Seal was good, the shaft was about 15 thousandths smaller than the MSD units shaft. After driving it for about 45 minutes I put it on the lift and checked it and it is dry as can be under there.

Thanks for all who posted with ideas and suggestions.


Sounds great.

Now, I'd be interested in seeing scans, SAME TEMPS, and the effects on all data of the new opti...
Posted on: 2008/11/5 5:26
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

teebee Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2014 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Lakin, Kansas 67860
12382 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/16 0:00



Offline
Quote:

Blade_1 wrote:
Sounds great.

Now, I'd be interested in seeing scans, SAME TEMPS, and the effects on all data of the new opti...


You know....that's not a bad idea. I'll try to get that done in the next few days.
Posted on: 2008/11/6 16:07
_________________
2007 Atomic Orange 3LT coupe. Borla Exhaust

One of Americas' proud Deplorable

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

teebee Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2014 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Lakin, Kansas 67860
12382 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/16 0:00



Offline
Well, I haven't had time to run another scan yet, but we did take the Vette for a weekend outing. 400 miles, she ran like a top. The gas mileage is back, around 26mpg for the trip (with some heavy footed blasts), and she runs as good or better than she has in months. I believe that the opti cap must have been bad from the get-go.

I'll see if I can get the scan this weekend.
Posted on: 2008/11/13 14:46
_________________
2007 Atomic Orange 3LT coupe. Borla Exhaust

One of Americas' proud Deplorable

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
Quote:

teebee1994 wrote:

I'll see if I can get the scan this weekend.


Posted on: 2008/11/13 15:00
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Pcolt94 Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Guru Newb
Orlando
31 Posts
Member since:
2008/4/8 13:13



Offline
I had your typical opti problems. Got bad when at operating temperature, coughed bucked on acceleration and sometime the idle wonder break up and hunt. After I check all under the hood and found basically nothing but knew it was miss-firing (of course no codes) . I even changed the coil, and EGR valve which was actually bad. But in the end when I replaced the opti all problems were fixed and it ran normal.

Pulled the entire old opti apart to inspect it all. Did not see any bearing wobble and the cap looked great with no carbon tracking visible or any other kind of problem that I could see visually for the original opti with about 75,000 miles on it. Never really determined exactly what was bad in it but I assume something was wrong with the cap or rotor. A littlie bit of rust on the inside on the rotating disk and that was about it.
Posted on: 2008/11/21 16:56
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
Quote:

Pcolt94 wrote:
I had your typical opti problems. Got bad when at operating temperature, coughed bucked on acceleration and sometime the idle wonder break up and hunt. After I check all under the hood and found basically nothing but knew it was miss-firing (of course no codes) . I even changed the coil, and EGR valve which was actually bad. But in the end when I replaced the opti all problems were fixed and it ran normal.

Pulled the entire old opti apart to inspect it all. Did not see any bearing wobble and the cap looked great with no carbon tracking visible or any other kind of problem that I could see visually for the original opti with about 75,000 miles on it. Never really determined exactly what was bad in it but I assume something was wrong with the cap or rotor. A littlie bit of rust on the inside on the rotating disk and that was about it.


Maybe there's only dirt or fouling that's jamming up the laser (or infra-red) reader, or whatever the opti imager device is...
Posted on: 2008/11/21 17:23
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Pcolt94 Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Guru Newb
Orlando
31 Posts
Member since:
2008/4/8 13:13



Offline
Blade_1 - You got my attention and got me thinking about what you said in regard to pulse width. I remembered that mine were half of what teebee posted. Then I looked at the fuel trim and they look out of range. My engine is all stock and thought perhaps my numbers which I think are good might be of some help for comparison for a possible clue or direction.

I just base lined all the engine data this week. I did it with key on, open loop and closed loop. I have only posed closed loop because the file copies poorly.

Item Closed Loop
RPM desired 622
RPM 625
Engine Coolant Temp 198
Air intake temp 147
MAP 37
BARO 104
Throttle Position 0.64
Throttle Angle 0
BNK 1 HOS 1S 100-800
Loop Status closed
BNK 2 HOS 2S 100-800
Loop Status closed
Eng Speed 630
BNK 2 HOS 2S 71
ST Fuel TR BNK 1 130
LT Fuel TR BNK 1 131
ST Fuel TR BNK 2 124
LT Fuel TR BNK 2 125
Fuel Trim Cell 16
Fuel Trim Enable yes
Spark Advance 20
Mass Air Flow 6.5 g/sec
Knock Retard 0
Knock Signal no
Lo Res Signal 23
Hi Res Signal yes
INJ Pulse Width Bank 1 3.4 ms
INJ Pulse Width Bank 2 3.3 ms
Idle Air Control 28
Leaned IAC 31
EGR Duty Cycle 6
Ststem Voltage 13.5
Air Control off
Fuel Evap Purge 0%
Knock Sensors OK
Engin Oil Temp 194
Injector Fault no
TCS/AIR Active no
Fan 1 2 1 off 2 off
Engine Coolant Temp 196
A/C Request no
A/C clutch no
A/C Status off
A/C comp pressure 93
TCC Brake Switch closed
TCC Solonoid off
Trans Range SW -
Park/Netural -
Cruse control off
MPH 0
1-2 Shift Sol on
2-3 Shift Sol on
Pass Key enabled
Time From Start 4 minutes
Posted on: 2008/11/23 4:35
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

bogus Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Grand Imperial Pooh-Bah
San Pedro, CA
20859 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/7 0:00



Offline
interesting... I am running an opti with over 110k miles on it. Then again, I have the LTCC system... no cap or rotor for me!
Posted on: 2008/11/23 5:38
_________________
The single biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place. - George Bernard Shaw

Education is the best tool to overcome irrational fear. - me

Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
I hope someone will chime in here and interpret these values, and normal ranges...

And where is teebee with the new scan???

Does your program have an option to display voltage equivalents (instead of absolute values) for all the readings?

Your bank 2 is running slightly less fuel than bank 1. Proper value should be 128 , plus or minus 6 (notice teebee's standard value, and his 'off' value). But both of your banks are delivering almost exactly the 'learned' standard - this is good. How long WAS yours been running with a problem?

I am betting if you re-set your BLM block long term memory value to 128, then your INT integrated/short term value will also adjust to 128. I don't know how to do this. It might slowly return to 128 for both banks - scan again in a week, and note values...

I am also presuming that your ST (BLM), and LT (INT) values are STANDARD trim, and LEARNED trim values...

Heated O2 ranges are given. Bank 2 actual value is given. Where is bank 1 actual value?

Your injector pulsewidth looks a little high, but I'm not totally sure of that. Normal range in milliseconds for a TPI is 1.6 at idle, to 12 at pedal down. LT1 pulsewidth at idle might be a little higher than 1.6. Anyone?

Your IAC count is 28. For a TPI, anything over 25 (from 0) means the IAC is having to let in too much air. Again, LT1 might be different. Do you have any carbon build-up behind TB butterfly, that's blocking normal air?

Attach file:



png  datacomp.png (211.15 KB)
1687_4929b014c1f6d.png 1440X900 px
Posted on: 2008/11/23 19:33
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

teebee Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2014 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Lakin, Kansas 67860
12382 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/16 0:00



Offline
Sorry guys, I've been very busy with things and I was gone all last week, so I haven't even started the Vette up in three weeks. So I have not run a scan. When i do I'll post the numbers.
Posted on: 2008/12/1 19:30
_________________
2007 Atomic Orange 3LT coupe. Borla Exhaust

One of Americas' proud Deplorable

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
Quote:

teebee1994 wrote:
Sorry guys, I've been very busy with things and I was gone all last week, so I haven't even started the Vette up in three weeks. So I have not run a scan. When i do I'll post the numbers.


No matter... Colt disappeared too.

I'm tryin' to know some spec baseline values, and what broken parts does to one value directly, and to other values indirectly uh huh.

I bet Colt's short term and long term fuel trim values are all at 128 too.

Where is that guy huh can't count on anybody??????????
Posted on: 2008/12/2 0:10
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
Good tune info for LT1... I imagine the baseline specs are identical for vette LT1.

Anybody know differently?

http://www.ssz28.com/tech/Scanmaster.html
Posted on: 2008/12/2 18:54
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
MAP value should be approximately 1/3 barometric pressure reading.

Yours looks good for those values...

teebee gives voltages, not values...
http://www.corvette-guru.com/uploads/newbb/1687_4929b014c1f6d.png

EDIT: Seems if there's a vacuum leak, these values won't be in this proportion...

Quote:

Pcolt94 wrote:
Blade_1 - You got my attention and got me thinking about what you said in regard to pulse width. I remembered that mine were half of what teebee posted. Then I looked at the fuel trim and they look out of range. My engine is all stock and thought perhaps my numbers which I think are good might be of some help for comparison for a possible clue or direction.

I just base lined all the engine data this week. I did it with key on, open loop and closed loop. I have only posed closed loop because the file copies poorly.

Item Closed Loop
RPM desired 622
RPM 625
Engine Coolant Temp 198
Air intake temp 147
MAP 37
BARO 104

Throttle Position 0.64
Throttle Angle 0
BNK 1 HOS 1S 100-800
Loop Status closed
BNK 2 HOS 2S 100-800
Loop Status closed
Eng Speed 630
BNK 2 HOS 2S 71
ST Fuel TR BNK 1 130
LT Fuel TR BNK 1 131
ST Fuel TR BNK 2 124
LT Fuel TR BNK 2 125
Fuel Trim Cell 16
Fuel Trim Enable yes
Spark Advance 20
Mass Air Flow 6.5 g/sec
Knock Retard 0
Knock Signal no
Lo Res Signal 23
Hi Res Signal yes
INJ Pulse Width Bank 1 3.4 ms
INJ Pulse Width Bank 2 3.3 ms
Idle Air Control 28
Leaned IAC 31
EGR Duty Cycle 6
Ststem Voltage 13.5
Air Control off
Fuel Evap Purge 0%
Knock Sensors OK
Engin Oil Temp 194
Injector Fault no
TCS/AIR Active no
Fan 1 2 1 off 2 off
Engine Coolant Temp 196
A/C Request no
A/C clutch no
A/C Status off
A/C comp pressure 93
TCC Brake Switch closed
TCC Solonoid off
Trans Range SW -
Park/Netural -
Cruse control off
MPH 0
1-2 Shift Sol on
2-3 Shift Sol on
Pass Key enabled
Time From Start 4 minutes
Posted on: 2008/12/3 2:25
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
Found the voltage conversion chart.

teebee's voltage conversion shows a problem, unless he has a performance cam in his car

Quote:
7 MAP Sensor 2.23 Volts (= about 50 kPa)
8 Throttle Sensor 0.58 Volts
9 Throttle Angle 0.00 %
10 Battery Voltage 12.4 Volts
11 Barometric Press 4.35 Volts (= about just < 90 kPa)


teebee's ratio is more than 1/2. Something is not right there too...

Then he changed the knock sensor, and the ratio got MUCH closer to normal
Quote:
7 MAP Sensor 1.70 Volts (= about 40 kPa)
8 Throttle Sensor 0.58 Volts
9 Throttle Angle 0.00 %
10 Battery Voltage 13.60 Volts
11 Barometric Press 4.35 Volts (= about just < 090 kPa)


Now it's LESS than 1/2, but more than 1/3 by pretty much...

Is this a performance cam? Bad valve affecting manifold pressure???

Where is teebee here huh???
Posted on: 2008/12/3 2:49
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Schrade Re: 94 LT1 running rough
Elite Guru
eastern NC / e-i-e-i-o
1909 Posts
Member since:
2008/8/15 2:01



Offline
According to this tech write-up, the max O2 reading, as voltage, is 999mV. You're showing in excess of 1v (1000mV) there teebee...

Something is wrong there...

Both banks are showing enrichment in the first 2 scans (block learn reads), but the O2's are not in sync with this.

When you changed the KS, the value went from 7, to 1.

Good, but not good enough. Should be 0, which it was at the high idle read.
Posted on: 2008/12/3 3:46
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!!

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

teebee Re: 94 LT1 running rough
2014 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Lakin, Kansas 67860
12382 Posts
Member since:
2005/9/16 0:00



Offline
Alright a nice afternoon and I was able to get the Vette down off the lift and take it for a drive. I got a scan but I got it going down the road (71mph), hope this doesn't skew things.

Desired Idle (RPM) 550 550 550 550
Engine RPM (RPM) 2025 2025 2025 2025
Coolant Temp (°F) 196.2 196.2 196.2 196.2
Oil Temp (°F) 173.3 173.3 173.3 173.3
Manifold Air Tmp (°F) 59.9 59.9 59.9 59.9
A/C Pressure (PSI) 62 62 62 62
MAP Sensor (Volts) 1.92 1.8 1.72 1.58
Throttle Sensor (Volts) 0.94 0.9 0.9 0.86
Throttle Angle (%) 11 10 10 8
Battery Voltage (Volts) 13.9 13.9 13.9 13.9
Barometric Press (Volts) 4.29 4.29 4.29 4.29
Left O2 Sensor (mVolts) 928 928 932 924
Right O2 Sensor (mVolts) 888 888 897 897
Block Learn Cell 7 7 7 7
Left Block Learn value 160 160 160 160
Right Block Learn value 160 160 160 160
Left Integrator value 128 128 128 128
Right Integrator value 128 128 128 128
Left Inj Pulse (mS) 6.6 6.3 6 5.6
Injector Pulse (mS) 6.5 6.1 6 5.6
Mass Air Flow (gr/sec) 27 25 25 23
CCP Duty Cycle (%) 99.4 99.4 99.4 99.4
Idle Air Mtr Pos (steps) 63 63 61 60
Learned Idle Pos (steps) 10 10 10 10
Spark Advance (°) 37 40 41 44
Knock Retard (°) 3 2 1 0
Knock Sensor 44 44 44 44
EGR Duty Cycle (%) 0 0 0 0
Vehicle Speed (MPH) 71 71 71 71
Engine Run Time (seconds) 550 551 552 553

Attach file:


csv 12-6-08a.csv Size: 4.92 KB; Hits: 185
Posted on: 2008/12/6 22:25
_________________
2007 Atomic Orange 3LT coupe. Borla Exhaust

One of Americas' proud Deplorable

Resized Image
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]


CorvetteForum.guru is independently owned and operated. This site is not associated with or financially supported by General Motors.

Copyright 2008-2015 CorvetteForum.guru

CorvetteForum.guru is a Guru Garage Site (Coming Soon!)

If you have any questions about our site, please contact us at Andy@corvetteforum.guru.

Powered by XOOPS 2.56 Copyright 2001-2014 www.xoops.org

Hosted by GoDaddy.com.