Become a Fan!
Login
Username:

Password:

Remember Me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Who's Online
272 user(s) are online (199 user(s) are browsing Forums)

GRIS, more...
Guru Dictionary
Print in friendly format Send this term to a friend  LT4
Engine used in 1996, all manual equipped cars came with this engine....
Supporting Vendors
Platinum
Mid America Motorworks
Mid America Motorworks FREE CATALOG


Gold
FIC 770-888-1662


Registered Vendors
Guru Friends
Supporting Banners

TIRERACK.com - Revolutionizing Tire Buying


Shop for Winter Tires Now!




Support This Site
 Register To Post

sliding Big cams vs vacuum
Senior Guru
Zagreb, Croatia
326 Posts
Member since:
2005/11/25 0:00



Offline
I'd like to see or hear how much vacuum are your engines with
bigger than stock cams making at idle?!
Posted on: 2010/7/15 10:20
_________________
'90 L98 auto with a lot of mods
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Matatk Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Webmaster
SW Chicago Burbs
22805 Posts
Member since:
2008/1/7 0:00



Offline
Is this just out of curiosity or are you concerned with braking, etc? I don't have a vacuum gauge, but I'll have to get a video of my motor running later. I have something like a 224/232 cam and it has a nice lope, good braking, no issues at 800 rpm idle.

Matthew
Posted on: 2010/7/15 11:35
_________________
2002 EBM convertible, Magnusson supercharger, cam, headers, etc.
1989 Corvette...RIP
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Trae1976 Re: Big cams vs vacuum
2012 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Johnson City, TN
832 Posts
Member since:
2008/4/17 11:30



Offline
Mine's pulling 11-12in with a Comp 270H. I believe the stock system in mine was about 18in.

Quote:
12-211-2 - Comp Cams 'Magnum' Hydraulic Flat Tappet Camshafts Details
Operating Range: 1800-5800 RPM
Duration Advertised: 270° Intake / 270° Exhaust
Duration @ .050'' Lift: 224° Intake / 224° Exhaust
Valve Lift w/1.5 Rockers: .470'' Intake / .470'' Exhaust
Lobe Separation Angle: 110°
Posted on: 2010/7/15 11:47
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

sliding Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Senior Guru
Zagreb, Croatia
326 Posts
Member since:
2005/11/25 0:00



Offline
I'm just curious, for comparison purpose. I'm still
having idle issues and I'm not sure if vacuum is as
should be, or is too low.

MAP readings (Datamaster or some other logger) at idle
(it doesn't have to be vacuum gauge) is what I'm interested in.
Posted on: 2010/7/15 11:49
_________________
'90 L98 auto with a lot of mods
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

sliding Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Senior Guru
Zagreb, Croatia
326 Posts
Member since:
2005/11/25 0:00



Offline
Quote:

Trae1976 wrote:
Mine's pulling 11-12in with a Comp 270H. I believe the stock system in mine was about 18in.

Quote:
12-211-2 - Comp Cams 'Magnum' Hydraulic Flat Tappet Camshafts Details
Operating Range: 1800-5800 RPM
Duration Advertised: 270° Intake / 270° Exhaust
Duration @ .050'' Lift: 224° Intake / 224° Exhaust
Valve Lift w/1.5 Rockers: .470'' Intake / .470'' Exhaust
Lobe Separation Angle: 110°


Thanks! What is your idle set at?
Posted on: 2010/7/15 11:50
_________________
'90 L98 auto with a lot of mods
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Trae1976 Re: Big cams vs vacuum
2012 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Johnson City, TN
832 Posts
Member since:
2008/4/17 11:30



Offline
Quote:
sliding wrote:
Thanks! What is your idle set at?

About 700.
Posted on: 2010/7/15 12:02
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

flyboy Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Elite Guru
Westmont, Il.
2632 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/28 12:47



Offline
15"@ idle, 700rpm, 19"@1500rpm.
LT4 "Hotcam", 218/228@.050,.492/.525w 1.5X1.6 rockers.
LSA 112*, 6*timing, stock was 19" vac. @ idle.
Posted on: 2010/7/15 12:13
_________________
'91coupe, LT4Hotcam, some other stuff.
If it's too loud, you're too old.
"He works on old cars, then junks 'em"
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Senior Guru
446 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 9:08



Offline
12" @ idle, 900 rpm

226/230.565.565/111lsa

Lobe Lift .3533 .3533

duration @ .006 280 284
Posted on: 2010/7/16 6:57
_________________
1996 Corvette Coupe,AFR 195 street Eliminators,Edelbrock LT4 Air Gap intake manifold,9.5" 2800 stall,TPIS LT headers,Bullet 226/230.565.565/111 lsa cam,1.7 Scorpion rr's,EWP, X Pipe, Stock Exhaust,Elec.Cutouts,Dana 44/3.45, Tune by Wester's Garage
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

sliding Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Senior Guru
Zagreb, Croatia
326 Posts
Member since:
2005/11/25 0:00



Offline
Please let me know if my math is correct!

Let's take Weavsvets cam for example.
He's making 12" (it's inHg, right?) at idle.
If we convert that to kPa, that makes ~40 kPa.
So if we take 40kPa off of ~101kPa(atmospheric pressure),
does it mean that his MAP reading at idle should be
arround 61kPa?

Also, does compression have effect on vacuum?
Posted on: 2010/7/16 10:19
_________________
'90 L98 auto with a lot of mods
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

pr0zac Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Elite Guru
Pittsburgh
1045 Posts
Member since:
2008/10/20 23:28



Offline
i don't know what its vac reading is at idle. its around 800 rpm and my cam is a 245/253 @ .050 .612/.612 on a 107lsa, 300/308 @.006 and my brakes work fine.
Posted on: 2010/7/16 15:34
_________________
96 lt4. 357ci, 11:1, LE 226/232, LE2 LT4 heads, ported LT4 intake, EM Gladiator44, EM LT's, stock exhaust, NX kit.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

sliding Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Senior Guru
Zagreb, Croatia
326 Posts
Member since:
2005/11/25 0:00



Offline
What CID engine do you have? Stroker?
That cam is way bigger than mine and I'm getting comments that my cam is too big.
Posted on: 2010/7/16 18:42
_________________
'90 L98 auto with a lot of mods
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

biggrizzly Re: Big cams vs vacuum
2011 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
Chesapeake Beach, Maryland
4543 Posts
Member since:
2006/4/23 0:00



Offline
OK here some more specs for you.

My cam card is shown below: This is an emissions legal cam profile designed by Brett Bauer to run with my LE2 heads and pass Maryland emissions so its not too big but supposed to develop better torque and power than the GM Hot Cam.

Based on one of my early scans that I can open and look at today it shows my MAP KPa jumping between 50.0-55.7 at idle around 800 rpm.

At high RPM between 5400-5600 RPM it was registering between 11.8 and 14 Kpa

Cam Specs
Resized Image
Posted on: 2010/7/16 20:00
_________________
Don Haller
Corvette Club of America
94Coupe, 383Stroka, PeteK Trans, 3000stall, 3.54rear, Konis and bigger sways.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

pr0zac Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Elite Guru
Pittsburgh
1045 Posts
Member since:
2008/10/20 23:28



Offline
385
Posted on: 2010/7/16 20:43
_________________
96 lt4. 357ci, 11:1, LE 226/232, LE2 LT4 heads, ported LT4 intake, EM Gladiator44, EM LT's, stock exhaust, NX kit.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

iCorvette Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Senior Guru
302 Posts
Member since:
2009/7/16 17:45



Offline
13.5 inches 850 idle, still lousy brakes
Posted on: 2010/7/16 21:07
_________________
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

pr0zac Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Elite Guru
Pittsburgh
1045 Posts
Member since:
2008/10/20 23:28



Offline
Quote:

iCorvette wrote:
13.5 inches 850 idle, still lousy brakes


you have something wrong with your brakes then. i ran that cam for years and never had a brake issue.
Posted on: 2010/7/17 4:24
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Aboatguy Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Senior Guru
My Avatar was redistributed!
498 Posts
Member since:
2007/12/3 0:00



Offline
Quote:

sliding wrote:
Please let me know if my math is correct!

Let's take Weavsvets cam for example.
He's making 12" (it's inHg, right?) at idle.
If we convert that to kPa, that makes ~40 kPa.
So if we take 40kPa off of ~101kPa(atmospheric pressure),
does it mean that his MAP reading at idle should be
arround 61kPa?

Also, does compression have effect on vacuum?



From checking my datalogs/vs my vacuum gauge your are correct manifold vacuum will reflect in the differential between MAP and BARO at idle. Baro-MAP = manifold vacuum
Posted on: 2010/7/17 14:15
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

sliding Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Senior Guru
Zagreb, Croatia
326 Posts
Member since:
2005/11/25 0:00



Offline
Quote:

Aboatguy wrote:
From checking my datalogs/vs my vacuum gauge your are correct manifold vacuum will reflect in the differential between MAP and BARO at idle. Baro-MAP = manifold vacuum


Thanks!

Thank you all guys!
Posted on: 2010/7/17 15:28
_________________
'90 L98 auto with a lot of mods
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Weavsvet Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Senior Guru
446 Posts
Member since:
2008/9/16 9:08



Offline
Sliding
Just so you know I have plenty of brakes at 12" of vacuum. Hope you get it squared away.


EDIT: urns out I had a intake leak. I believe it was the grommet for the PCV. I fixed that and my vacuum went to 14".
Posted on: 2010/7/17 20:15
_________________
1996 Corvette Coupe,AFR 195 street Eliminators,Edelbrock LT4 Air Gap intake manifold,9.5" 2800 stall,TPIS LT headers,Bullet 226/230.565.565/111 lsa cam,1.7 Scorpion rr's,EWP, X Pipe, Stock Exhaust,Elec.Cutouts,Dana 44/3.45, Tune by Wester's Garage
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

dan0617 Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Senior Guru
Tyrone, PA
1260 Posts
Member since:
2007/12/30 0:00



Offline
12" of vac at idle, 230/236 cam on a 110 lsa. Only time brakes don't work right is when the vac booster is toast. My car is a MAF car so I don't have any MAP info for you.
Posted on: 2010/7/17 20:23
_________________
´89 Vert, 383, 230/236 cam, AFR 195's, LT Headers, HSR intake, 2800 stall, Zex 200 shot, ET Street Radials, tune by me. Runs were with D36 3.07's.
On spray, 10.55 @ 132.78, 1.55 60 ft.
On motor, 12.08 @ 113.15, 1.66 60 ft.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

pr0zac Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Elite Guru
Pittsburgh
1045 Posts
Member since:
2008/10/20 23:28



Offline
Quote:

dan0617 wrote:
12" of vac at idle, 230/236 cam on a 110 lsa. Only time brakes don't work right is when the vac booster is toast. My car is a MAF car so I don't have any MAP info for you.


when you going to step up to a HR cam? i wanna see what you can make that car run....
Posted on: 2010/7/18 0:07
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

iCorvette Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Senior Guru
302 Posts
Member since:
2009/7/16 17:45



Offline
Quote:

pr0zac wrote:
Quote:

iCorvette wrote:
13.5 inches 850 idle, still lousy brakes


you have something wrong with your brakes then. i ran that cam for years and never had a brake issue.


new booster 5k miles ago, does not hiss....
Posted on: 2010/7/18 3:19
_________________
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Josh Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Guru
Raleigh, NC
666 Posts
Member since:
2008/1/1 0:00



Offline
230 / 236, .57X/.57X, 113 LSA. It's a comp cams 280 XFI cam. No problems, 750-800 idle.

45-50 KPA at idle, measured with Data Master. Car is an M6.

A tuner I know and respect thinks that you could go 240/250 or more and still make it work. If mine ever comes apart again, that's the route I'm going. Probably something in the upper 240's and upper 250's.

Don't worry about the guys saying your cam is too big, that's the Corvette mentality it seems like. 99% of those guys haven't ever done a cam swap. They're just regurgitating what they've read on the net.
Posted on: 2010/7/18 4:36
_________________
"Have ya paid your dues, Jack?" "Yessir, the check is in the mail." - Jack Burton
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

tpi421vett Re: Big cams vs vacuum
Registered Vendor
Salt Lake City Utah
125 Posts
Member since:
2008/11/17 19:59



Offline
I have 11" of vacuum with a 252/260SR and the brakes work great. But it is a 450ci engine.
Posted on: 2010/7/19 3:06
_________________
AFR Dealer, can sell at prices too low to advertise. 801-953-6391
08 C6 LS3,3LT,Z51,A6,NPP
91 vette,450ci, AFR 220, miniram,FAST, Crane 252/260 solid roller, 200 shot nos, ZF6, 4 link, 9", DA corrected to 1300 ft 9.65@145.xx
450ci now with AFR 235...
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]


CorvetteForum.guru is independently owned and operated. This site is not associated with or financially supported by General Motors.

Copyright 2008-2015 CorvetteForum.guru

CorvetteForum.guru is a Guru Garage Site (Coming Soon!)

If you have any questions about our site, please contact us at Andy@corvetteforum.guru.

Powered by XOOPS 2.56 Copyright 2001-2014 www.xoops.org

Hosted by GoDaddy.com.