|
Register To Post |
MK 82 | Yes or No? | ||
Senior Guru
|
I will be installing a new cam in my 96 LT4 soon. I know I can use the same used stock roller lifters with my new roller cam. 50,000 miles on lifters.
Would you change them and if so, what would you use? Would also appreciate a part # for stock LT4 lifters. |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/13 23:35
|
|||
_________________
96 CE Roadster LT4 |
|||
Transfer |
Notorious | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Elite Guru
|
What lift is on the cam you're using? Unless it's very radical, I wouldn't worry. I changed my stock roller lifters at well over 100K miles and they were still performing well. They had been used with the Hotcam, stiffer springs, etc. for about 25K miles by then. The only reason I changed them is because I had come across a very low mileage set by that time. So while the engine was apart anyway, I swapped. I'll be using the originals again in a motor for my hot rod Model A.
I wouldn't give them another moments thought, they'll be fine. These are very good lifters in these LTx motors. |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 0:55
|
|||
_________________
I hate sporks... |
|||
Transfer |
Jeffvette | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Elite Guru
|
You're in there, might as well for some piece of mind. I'd suggest using the upgraded LS7 lifter. It's a direct replacement. I can sell them at 135 shipped.
|
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 1:03
|
|||
Transfer |
biggrizzly | RE:Yes or No? | ||
2011 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
|
In my book its a waste of money to go replacing fine lifters on a roller cam with only 50k miles. If you have some extra cash and don't NEED other stuff, then yes, replacements would be an insurance policy. But I bet your old ones are as good as new if you maintained the car and changed the oil regularly and had no problems. 50k miles is hardly broken in.
|
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 1:14
|
|||
_________________
Don Haller Corvette Club of America 94Coupe, 383Stroka, PeteK Trans, 3000stall, 3.54rear, Konis and bigger sways. |
|||
Transfer |
Jeffvette | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Elite Guru
|
Quote:
In my book its a waste of money to go replacing fine lifters on a roller cam with only 50k miles. If you have some extra cash and don't NEED other stuff, then yes, replacements would be an insurance policy. But I bet your old ones are as good as new if you maintained the car and changed the oil regularly and had no problems. 50k miles is hardly broken in. That's a big "if" if he is not the original owner. It amazes me as to what some Vette owners neglect to do. I imagine since he is doing a hot cam conversion, he probably does not Sunday drive the vehicle. It probably sees some high rpm use. |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 1:18
|
|||
Transfer |
RollaMo-LT4 | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Trivia Winner
|
From the news today, I bet Hendrick Motorsports might have a few sets they would let go real cheap.
|
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 1:20
|
|||
Transfer |
biggrizzly | RE:Yes or No? | ||
2011 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
|
Quote:
That's a big "if" if he is not the original owner. It amazes me as to what some Vette owners neglect to do. I imagine since he is doing a hot cam conversion, he probably does not Sunday drive the vehicle. It probably sees some high rpm use. Whatever - As I said its just insurance. too much insurance is sold on all the Corvette Forums as far as I'm concerned. As long as people got extra money to throw on stuff, thats cool! I've done the same. I just think there are better things to insure than lifters at 50k miles. |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 1:31
|
|||
_________________
Don Haller Corvette Club of America 94Coupe, 383Stroka, PeteK Trans, 3000stall, 3.54rear, Konis and bigger sways. |
|||
Transfer |
crash | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Guru
|
replace them with the same ones recommended for that cam from the manufacture
dont be penny wise and pound foolish thats like taking a shower and putting the same underwear back on thats what i would do unless you feel lucky thats a lot of work if one goes bad and wipes out a cam lobe u mite chkwid pappyfreebyrd himwell sat u stait |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 1:46
|
|||
Transfer |
Notorious | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Elite Guru
|
Quote:
Quote: I agree. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone more particular than me when it comes to things as critical as internal engine work. In my time I've built and done other major work to literally hundreds (if not more) engines of most any type you could imagine. This includes both gas and diesel, stock and modified. Yet I've never had a catastrophic problem with any of them. Obviously if there's any doubt, I don't take a chance. But Chevy roller lifters are extremely reliable. And if they come out of an engine that's a known quantity and are fully inspected, I'd have no concerns after that in using them for a reasonable street build. |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 1:53
|
|||
_________________
I hate sporks... |
|||
Transfer |
biggrizzly | RE:Yes or No? | ||
2011 Memorial Day Car Show Winner!
|
These are roller lifter cams we are talking about here. The resources I used when rebuilding my engine all said that there are no worries with reusing good roller lifters.
Replace if it makes you feel better - no argument from me there. There is no pound foolishness about reusing good lifters. |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 1:55
|
|||
_________________
Don Haller Corvette Club of America 94Coupe, 383Stroka, PeteK Trans, 3000stall, 3.54rear, Konis and bigger sways. |
|||
Transfer |
Notorious | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Elite Guru
|
Quote:
These are roller lifter cams we are talking about here. The resources I used when rebuilding my engine all said that there are no worries with reusing good roller lifters. Although only vaguely applicable here, when I was regularly overhauling HD diesel truck engines, in a well cared for engine reusing the roller parts in even one million mile engines was quite routine. This included even the cams themselves. |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 2:06
|
|||
Transfer |
dan0617 | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Senior Guru
|
Although I just got mine fired up and haven't driven it yet, I reused my stock roller lifters. All advice pointed to reusing them. I'm going to be less than 6500 rpm's, .544 lift on the cam, and they worked fine before the teardown. I'm confident they will be fine.
|
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 2:36
|
|||
_________________
ยด89 Vert, 383, 230/236 cam, AFR 195's, LT Headers, HSR intake, 2800 stall, Zex 200 shot, ET Street Radials, tune by me. Runs were with D36 3.07's. On spray, 10.55 @ 132.78, 1.55 60 ft. On motor, 12.08 @ 113.15, 1.66 60 ft. |
|||
Transfer |
MK 82 | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Senior Guru
|
Quote:
Where does it say it is a HotCam conversion? It is my toy that I drive when I want to feel good. Extra Horsepower feels good. I purposely left off the pedigree of the replacement cam to head off the HotCam debate and I'll be damned if it didn't happen anyway. All I care about is lifters. Let's try to stick to that! |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 3:03
|
|||
_________________
96 CE Roadster LT4 |
|||
Transfer |
tobijohn | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Senior Guru
|
Are you installing the cam yourself? If so, I wouldn't mind lending a hand just to gain the experience. I'm pretty sure I'd be a little bit more helpful than a trained chimpanzee. Also, if you're interested, I'm a member of the Grand Sport Registry and have access to a step-by-step illustrated Hot Cam install guide. I know it's not a Hot Cam but I'd think as far as the R&R is concerned, a cam is a cam. Let me know...
|
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 3:30
|
|||
_________________
John 1996 LT4 coupe black/black 160 Tstat, K&N, Hypertech PPIII (for the fans), CAGS, Nitto 555 EPs, 275/315s, Chrome A-molds, a little tint and some black-outs AIRFOIL FREE! |
|||
Transfer |
Jeffvette | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Elite Guru
|
Quote:
I could care less if it's a hot cam or a cc306 or anything else. You are wanting more power. Spend the hundred bucks on the lifters or don't. |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 3:38
|
|||
Transfer |
MK 82 | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Senior Guru
|
Thanks man! I am comfortable with the installlation but I have a garage with a fridge full of beer and you are welcome anytime.
I have stockpiled for one marathon session for my LT4: 1. Cam for LT4 --- May be or may not be a Hot Cam. 2. EM coated longtubes. 3. DeWitt radiator. 4. Port matching head and intake. __________________________________________________________ Objects in the mirror are LOSING! |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 3:41
|
|||
_________________
96 CE Roadster LT4 |
|||
Transfer |
DrEvil | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Guru
|
I've been using the stockers in mine on my HC swap for over 30k miles now. No problems so far.
|
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 5:00
|
|||
_________________
1996 Coupe Hotcam, headers, true duals, 4.10s. 1969 Wife. Stock, special ordered with redhead package and ride control. 2005 Son. Order date Nov27th 2004. Build date Aug 9th 2005 . Stock with blonde hair/blue eyes and hell on wheels package. |
|||
Transfer |
toptechx6 | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Senior Guru
|
Since no one else addressed your original question, the part number for the stock lifters is 17120735 if you are still interested.
|
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 9:36
|
|||
Transfer |
tobijohn | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Senior Guru
|
Quote:
Thanks man! I am comfortable with the installlation but I have a garage with a fridge full of beer and you are welcome anytime. Well, if you don't mind the company, let me know before you begin any of those upgrades. Just about all of them are things I'd like to do myself eventually... |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 12:21
|
|||
Transfer |
MK 82 | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Senior Guru
|
Quote:
Since no one else addressed your original question, the part number for the stock lifters is 17120735 if you are still interested. Thanks!! |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 15:22
|
|||
_________________
96 CE Roadster LT4 |
|||
Transfer |
MK 82 | RE:Yes or No? | ||
Senior Guru
|
Quote:
Quote: I will do that. I may be a few months. |
||
Posted on: 2008/2/14 15:25
|
|||
_________________
96 CE Roadster LT4 |
|||
Transfer |
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|