|
Register To Post |
sliding | Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Senior Guru
|
One of the things that troubles me the most, is rotating assembly
balancing. Problem is that in Croatia nobody does it. You can have crank balanced, but nobody asks for pistons or rods for this. They just balance crank?! From what I have ben reading on internet, it's important to know exact weight of rotating parts to be able to balance the crank. And also from what I've read, balancing [B]IS VERY IMPORTANT[/B]. And now, it's hollidays, and I have some time, so I took David Vizard's "How to build max performance Chevy on a budget" book and here is a C/P of very interesting part of the text: [B]"... balancing does not mean that there will be more destructive internal engine loads present. What it does mean is that whatever forces are generated at one journal may not be fully countered by forces generated at another. The result is an out-of balance engine. But the engine is no more likely to fail than if it were perfectly balanced."[/B] And here is another C/P: [B]"If the budget exists, balancing the rotating assembly is recommended. But be aware that your motor will be just as reliable and run just as well without balancing."[/B] ??? |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/26 19:37
|
|||
_________________
'90 L98 auto with a lot of mods |
|||
Transfer |
PeteK | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Moderator
|
Quote:
You need to know the exact weight (to the gram) of the following: Piston rings piston wrist pin connecting rod small end connecting rod big end rod bearing There is a formula that will come up with a bobweight (and I do not have it handy). Typically, 3 grams are added to the rod big end to acount for oil weight. However, that is opinional based on the guy doing the balancing. Once you know your bobweight, the guy balancing needs to know the rpm range of the engine. |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/26 19:47
|
|||
_________________
"It was really on a pass until it came apart." "Yeah. They always are." |
|||
Transfer |
jsup | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Elite Guru
|
If you've ever driven a car with a motor that was balanced, then in one that wasn't you can feel the difference, the balanced motor spins up more smoothly.
Or, it was all in my mind. I'm not sure which. |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/26 22:11
|
|||
_________________
Parts don't make power, engines make power. |
|||
Transfer |
PeteK | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Moderator
|
Quote:
Without a doubt, you can feel the difference. Much smoother throughout the rpm band. |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/26 22:13
|
|||
_________________
"It was really on a pass until it came apart." "Yeah. They always are." |
|||
Transfer |
BrianCunningham | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Senior Guru
|
GM balanced some LTX engines "on the fly" after running.
Kinda tells you how important it is. And that's on street engines. |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/26 22:15
|
|||
_________________
Polo Green 95 LT1 6-spd http://mysite.verizon.net/vzevcp74/ 383 LT1/Vortech Supercharger/AFR heads/Rod end suspension/Penske-Hardbar dual rate coilovers/Wilwood 6pot brakes NCCC Governor: http://BayStateCorvetteClub.com |
|||
Transfer |
Qack | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Senior Guru
|
I guess I have to take exception to David Vizard's comments concerning balancing and wear. An unbalanced engine will incur higher internal forces than a balanced one -- as evidenced by the shaking everyone who has driven both can attest to - unless it's in my mind! These forces will create additional wear -- and if the unbalanced forces are enough, they will tear the engine apart. That said, most products that you put in your engine are close enough that your engine will be "just fine" if you drive it gently. If you beat on it, it will get beat.
|
||
Posted on: 2008/12/26 22:44
|
|||
_________________
|
|||
Transfer |
Schrade | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Elite Guru
|
Quote:
Well, the Vizard statement is made up of 4 negations, and a negation is exactly that - NOTHING. "... balancing does NOT mean..." OK; I don't need to know what something is NOT, just tell me what it DOES mean. "What is does mean ... whatever(?) forces ... may NOT be countered..." HUH? They may NOT? Or they MAY, I guess??? I should flip a coin? Cause that statement doesn't say anything definitive either. "The result is an out-of-balance engine". HUH again? What if those forces WERE countered? THAT don't matter either, cause he says the result is something that is NOT [something]. "But the engine is [not] ...". See comment #1. This Vizard guy sounds like a politician. 'See how many happy words you can say, and NOT be saying anything'. He wouldn't want to listen to MY questions. |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/27 16:06
|
|||
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!! |
|||
Transfer |
jsup | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Elite Guru
|
Quote:
Blade, I agree with you 100%. He tries to simplify (in my opinion) for the ignorant masses and at the end of the day says nothing. Remember who pays his bills. Manufacturers. A specific answer to balancing would piss off all the manufacturers that don't balance. It's a revenue tight rope. Bite the hand and all that crap. |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/27 16:21
|
|||
_________________
Parts don't make power, engines make power. |
|||
Transfer |
Schrade | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Elite Guru
|
I just found Mr. Vizard in another forum, as a member, and I posted a copy of my response here, in that forum.
We'll see if we can get some declarative statements from Mr. Vizard. http://www.gofastnews.com/board/engin ... zard-please-stand-up.html |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/27 16:57
|
|||
_________________
LT5, Marc Haibeck ECM module, AUTOMATIC!!! |
|||
Transfer |
sidney004 | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Guru Newb
|
This is also a very informative site with a lot a pro engine builders that post:
http://www.speedtalk.com/forum/viewfo ... 84a06bd81af1f917a413a2eca |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/27 20:56
|
|||
Transfer |
BeachBum | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Master Guru
|
In my opinion, engine balancing is very worth while on a high performance engine.... and considering the relative low cost of balancing these days, a no-brainer.
But, I know a lot of street motors are not balanced, and they are probably just fine tooling around under the direction of your wifes foot never seeing north of 4000 rpm..... but to each their own. |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/27 21:24
|
|||
_________________
863 cubic inches of C4 & C6 muscle C6 Corvette Z06 - Lemans Metallic Blue C4 Corvette 436 - Pure Black http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3933547 ... chevrolet-corvette/page-1 |
|||
Transfer |
cuisinartvette | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Elite Guru
|
Quote:
I understand Vizard is a regular poster there pretty neat to read about some of the science experiments and one offs these guys come up with. |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/27 23:27
|
|||
Transfer |
sliding | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Senior Guru
|
One problem solved. I contacted a company (actually it's very small
family business) today about balancing. One very friendly man anwsered me and first thing that he asked me, when I told him what I need, was;"do you know exact weight of all parts, or even better, do you have all of the parts to bring them to me." This man has worked with balancing for 30 years now, and he also has experience with v-8 engines. Mostly for marine use, but V-8's. One thing that he agreed with all of you and me, is that balancing is a must, even for street driven engines, and of course, even more for high rpm racing engines. I don't know what are prices for balancing in US, but it will cost me arround $150. If it'll be done good, I'll be more than happy with that! |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/29 18:04
|
|||
_________________
'90 L98 auto with a lot of mods |
|||
Transfer |
PeteK | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Moderator
|
Quote:
That is exactly what it cost me to balance a crank. |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/29 18:34
|
|||
_________________
"It was really on a pass until it came apart." "Yeah. They always are." |
|||
Transfer |
dan0617 | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Senior Guru
|
Not to steal the thread but here is a question along the same lines, kind of fits in this thread:
If someone buys an aftermarket rotating assembly, like made by Scat or Eagle or ???, do you need to install it then go have the engine balanced, do you take it to the machine shop to get it balanced before you install it in the block, or is it already balanced since it came as a kit and all you need to do is install it and be good to go? |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/29 20:39
|
|||
_________________
ยด89 Vert, 383, 230/236 cam, AFR 195's, LT Headers, HSR intake, 2800 stall, Zex 200 shot, ET Street Radials, tune by me. Runs were with D36 3.07's. On spray, 10.55 @ 132.78, 1.55 60 ft. On motor, 12.08 @ 113.15, 1.66 60 ft. |
|||
Transfer |
PeteK | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Moderator
|
Quote:
It depends. Some of the low dollar stuff does not always come balanced as described. Because of this, I prefer to buy unbalanced and then balance it for piece of mind. |
||
Posted on: 2008/12/29 21:05
|
|||
_________________
"It was really on a pass until it came apart." "Yeah. They always are." |
|||
Transfer |
pr0zac | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Elite Guru
|
i bought a kit like that but it came with a balance card so i didn't bother.
|
||
Posted on: 2008/12/30 19:26
|
|||
_________________
96 lt4. 357ci, 11:1, LE 226/232, LE2 LT4 heads, ported LT4 intake, EM Gladiator44, EM LT's, stock exhaust, NX kit. |
|||
Transfer |
BrianCunningham | Re: Balancing (please step inside) | ||
Senior Guru
|
This guy bought a brand new ZZ4, check this out:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/engin ... ncing.html#post1568529229 [QUOTE]John A. Marker: I promised to post the results of the balancing of my brand new ZZ4 GM short block. (Also posted in C4 Tech) This came assembled, so I had to pull the pistons and press out the pins. I have to assume that since this was assembled by GM, that these weights were within their tolerance for a balanced engine. All of these weights are in grams. Pistons Rods Pins Pistons & Pins 1 533.9 598.5 159.8 693.7 2 531.4 600.8 160.0 691.4 3 533.8 601.5 159.4 693.2 4 533.6 600.8 159.2 692.8 5 530.8 599.2 159.7 690.5 6 533.3 596.1 160.0 693.3 7 533.5 602.4 159.4 692.9 8 534.8 596.9 159.6 694.4 As you can see, the greatest difference between two pistons is 4.0 grams and 6.3 grams for the rods. There is not too much you can do with the pins to balance them. And the piston and pin combination is the end product that counts. Just think of large rocks at the end of sticks twirling around, you sure would want them to all weigh the same. After balancing the piston/pin combination, they all weigh 690.5 +/- .1 grams. We threw the pistons on the scale and they all weight 690.5 or 690.6 grams. The rods were balanced to 596.1 grams +/- .1 grams. The balancing was done by Ed's Crankshafts in Hayward California. The shop is run by two brothers, Ed and Carlos. I have know both for years and Ed's wife used to work for me years ago. There are not too many crank grinding shops left in the area. Ed's does most of the cranks for the East and South Bay machine shops. The GM balance may be okay for those that drive down the freeway or side roads at no more than 2500-3000 rpm. But if you want an engine that will run smoothly and last....BALANCE IT.[/QUOTE] |
||
Posted on: 2009/1/13 1:40
|
|||
_________________
Polo Green 95 LT1 6-spd http://mysite.verizon.net/vzevcp74/ 383 LT1/Vortech Supercharger/AFR heads/Rod end suspension/Penske-Hardbar dual rate coilovers/Wilwood 6pot brakes NCCC Governor: http://BayStateCorvetteClub.com |
|||
Transfer |
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|